#MasteryChat is a weekly chat with a growing family of educators from around the word focused on teaching better and reaching more students. Topics cover an array of challenges and solutions for teachers of all grade levels and subject areas, admins, and support staff.
#MasteryChat occurs every Thursday at 8:00pm eastern.
The chat was created by team at @thegridmethod, but is hosted by guest moderators each week. Our primary moderators are @techieteachott, @raehugart, and @jeffgargas.
It's go time! Let's get this #masterychat conversation started right now!
Who are you, where are you from, and what do you think the MOST controversial topic in education is right now?
I can't wait to read your responses!
#Masterychat kicks off in 10 minutes! Are you ready to share you opinions and have a lively (civil, of course) debate about some of the controversial issues facing education today? I can't wait to moderate this chat!
See you there!
Blake Harvard, AP Psych teacher and blogger, Alabama
https://t.co/EJp11sZu1q
A lot of 'controversial' topics:
learning styles
lecturing
homework
#masterychat
Hello. My name is Susan, and I am a first year teacher from IL. I lost my voice and got acute laryngitis, but I am resting and slowly recovering. #masterychat
I'm Tiffany, tonight's moderator for #masterychat!
I teach in NE Ohio & work w/ the @teachbetterteam to help Ts find their own version of #teachbetter.
I think one of the most controversial topics today is the impact of privatization of education.
https://t.co/7VZOiT9Vum
#masterychat Rebecca from Ottawa Canada. I teach HS Social Sciences. The hot topics in ON right now are Sex Ed and Math. But I would say grades are another hot topic.
Merissa from TX is here!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think the most controversial topic in education right now is reading for pleasure versus leveled reading.
#Masterychat
Joy from IL - 7th gr ELA.
I'm not sure what the MOST controversial topic in edu. is right now - gun violence? SEL? grades?
Can we find out what it is somewhere? That would be an interesting website, for sure...
#masterychat
Welcome, Steve! So glad to have you here tonight. I can't wait to see what everyone brings to the table in these discussions. :) Looking forward to hearing your thoughts! #masterychat
Good Evening! After a week off from #masterychat I am SO excited for tonight! My name is Tayler and I am an Academic Dean & Instr. Coach at a HS in Orlando, FL. I think one of the most controversial topics right now is high stakes testing!
What he said!
We ARE going to disagree tonight! But you better be nice about it. :)
No need to be all cranky and grouchy when everyone here is just trying to learn and grow.
With that said, let's argue (productively)!
#masterychat
Marissa from the DC area and I think any step away from "traditional" is controversial -- especially things like SBG, flexible seating, and getting rid of high-stakes standardized tests #masterychat
It's go time! Let's get this #masterychat conversation started right now!
Who are you, where are you from, and what do you think the MOST controversial topic in education is right now?
I can't wait to read your responses!
Hi Nick! Thanks for being here tonight. Inclusion is one of those topics that swings on the pendulum, isn't it. I'm curious where you stand? Any thoughts to share? #masterychat
Hi all! Kristen from PA! I teach 6th grade physical science. And nothing right now is controversial when you’ve had 2 weeks like I’ve had... seriously epically awesome... I can’t think of any. Maybe state testing and the money that goes into that. #masterychat
Hello, everyone! I’m a 3rd year high school ELA teacher working in Orlando. I think a controversial topic in teaching is how to handle our current political climate while also being a “neutral” classroom leader. #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
#MasteryChat
Rich Anderson
North Syracuse
9th grade Global History
Most controversial topic? Hard to peg but I would say the changes needed to meet today’s learners: Role of technology, how we grade, and social emotional learning needs.
It's go time! Let's get this #masterychat conversation started right now!
Who are you, where are you from, and what do you think the MOST controversial topic in education is right now?
I can't wait to read your responses!
Woohoo! Glad you are here, Tayler. :)
Testing, testing, testing. We live it, talk about it, administer it, hate it, love it, cry about it, try to make it better...
What a complex beast it is, isn't it!?
#masterychat
#MasteryChat Hey everyone! I'm Tina, 7th grade ELA teacher from Reading, PA. I think that "proper use of technology" is a touchy subject lately. How much is too much? How much is not enough?
Hello!! I'm Angie, a 4th grade teacher. Hmmmm, just one huh...lackofsupportfundingtestingotherpeoplemakingdecisionswithnobackgroundineducation. That's one thing right? LOL #MasteryChat
Kimberly, FL. instructional staff developer for equity and CRT. Not b sure controversial is the word but whether or not ppl are really on board with equitable teaching send to be a hot topic. Is this forward movt or a check box #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
Thanks Tiffany! It is so hard, I see the massive benefits to some Ss of our inclusion model, but I also see Ss being exposed to violence, disruptions and so much more. Such a sensitive Subject as it deals with Ss and Parents of kids who have a pretty tough go #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1 I could not imagine lecture in the elementary grades. We need to engage our kids with purposeful discourse and activities with mini-lessons to spark their thinking. #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
Balance!
Why go all or none?
I know, not a controversial answer. I'll need to watch and see how this game is played tonight so I can learn... ;)
#MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1 I’m anti-lecture and pro discussion. If I am giving notes, that can be a homework assignment. But if we are in class I want to make sure that I am facilitating discussion rather than monopolizing it. #Masterychat
A1: I believe everything is good in moderation. We need ss to practice the variety of skills they will need in the future. All of the same breeds adults that are good in a few things. Some ss may learn best from lecturing. Don’t want to withhold that from them. #masterychat
In planning for this chat, I literally googled, "Most controversial topics in education today." There is, unsurprisingly, a bit of controversy about it. :)
This is an interesting to peruse for pros and cons of many, many issues! #masterychat
LIMITED!
6-8 Min Mini Lesson then "Student Time" focused on Mastering Personalized Learning. (Then end with Reflection & Goal Setting)
Boom! *Mic Drop*
#MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1: Lecture - nope! Not in my class, I have Grade 5 and I hold more attention and Ss show better retention while doing, sharing, and teaching, then if they just sit and listen/note take from me #masterychat
A1. You can lecture if you are entertaining and engaging, keep it quick to draw them in and also involve students in the process and provide other components to lessons. All the great Ted Talks or speeches against lecturing, guess how they do it. By lecturing...#masterychat
A1: I believe there needs to be a balanced! English language learners need to hear content language from teacher BUT the content must be made compressible for Ss to learn
#MasteryChat
A1 Lecutre in limited form is ok but used as a primary technique. A huge disservice and detriment to learning in a classroom! Lecture is not differentiated, not engaging, has a low impact and there is 0 support for its use in ED as a primary means of teaching #masterychat
A1 I agree with you. It does deliver the content, but it's also teacher centered and rarely gives the student voice or enough voice. Oh and boring because they're being talked at most of the time. #masterychat
Against big time. Short ones like 5-10 min to review are ok. Long lectures put students in a passive role. They zone out and miss things. Lecture using a flipped format works great, but only is 1.5 min x students grade level. #Masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
Controversy is NOT my thing... there will always be differences of opinions and...somehow we manage to muddle through. The controversy when I was in school many many years ago was whether or not students should walk to school or ride a bus shhh dont ask my age! #masterychat
It's go time! Let's get this #masterychat conversation started right now!
Who are you, where are you from, and what do you think the MOST controversial topic in education is right now?
I can't wait to read your responses!
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1 AGAINST LECTURE Ts should put Ss in positions of discovery not tell Ss what they think they should know. #StudentVoice & #StudentChoice do not mingle well with lecture #masterychat
I'm Erik from WI teaching SPED. I would say the MOST controversial topic is LGBTQ+ related issues and how to help students "without talking about the issues directly" #MasteryChat
A1: Teachers need to learn how to weave the two together to enhance a student's educational experience in a classroom. I think lecturing in chunks, allowing students to process & practice works best. Not all kids learn best by just listening. Dual mode is best! #masterychat
Hattie suggests that direct instruction (lecture?) is the most effective form of S learning. It is important for Ss to see organized, coherent presentation modeled. But.....not every day. #MasteryChat
So glad you are here, Blake. I would love for you to share some more of your thoughts on this. I know you are well-versed in the research, but would you mind telling me more about how you use it in your own class? How do you structure it?
#masterychat
A1) I will be honest I do some whole group instruction but the lecture is not my go-to by any means. So much more can be done in groups and differentiation. #masterychat
A1: Against. Ss don't need to hear me talking the whole time they should be doing, exploring and learning. Time for explanations or for background yes but not straight lecture for the entire class period #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
#MasteryChat Jerry Toups HS Math Tr from the Houston area. 1st rule has been #AlwaysBelieve in yourself since 1990! #ItWorks Enjoy the pic I took today! Largest topic in education now, IMO is the Tr / St relationship. This is the secret to growing your learners.
A1: I feel like I do lecture, but I try to keep it to a bare minimum. I prefer that the students are doing the work and interacting with each other. I set up classdojo on my kindle fire (thanks @teachbetterteam), and the students love earning points for helping. #masterychat
A1b. A good lecture can lead to a great discussion. My students were born after 9/11. TAlking about the 1960's might as well be talking about the 1760's. I was alive then. I have info to offer. #masterychat
A1: So, it's all about intent, right? If the intention matches the activity, sure! There's no one size fits all answer though. In some situations, lecture might be entirely appropriate. It depends on intent, learning goals, students, etc. #masterychat
A1: Lecture - I use it sparingly, because I don’t want to seem as the most important mind in the room. One goal is to teach Ss to learn to run their own minds. I much prefer listening to students give @TEDTalks or @PechaKucha style chats about their discoveries. #masterychat
#masterychat Lectures can be good once and awhile. The majority of the learning should be done by the Ss. We need to move away from the one lesson fits all model. Facilitate and you can do mini lectures depending on what students are interested in.
A1 - Neither. I don’t like the term lecture. But I do think that talking to students is key. It’s about creating an educational environment that is robust, creative, passionate and motivational. #masterychat
A1. Lecture sounds like a teacher-centered classroom. 👎 We should be working towards creating substantive conversations that are driven by students. #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1: I talk when I teach, not sure if it's a lecture though, more of a conversation because they talk at tables in groups then talk back to me so I know they're engaged. #MasteryChat
WOW! Great conversation happening already! I challenge each of you to find someone that disagrees with you and start a conversation with them. Let's learn from each other! #masterychat
A1- my thoughts are it would depend on age of audience, length of lecture and topic. I have been to exhilarating lectures and some zzzzzz ones. #MasteryChat
A1: Debb from SC—drama teacher trying to stay awake.
Lecture, when used sparingly, in small segments, can be useful. Must be engaging—sprinkled w/ humor, anecdotes, character. No dusty pages of notes read monotonously.
#masterychat
A1. Lecture can occur, but keep it short within 5-8 minutes. Where Ss have time to be engaged in learning with hands on activities, experiments, designing, building, creativity, etc. #masterychat
A1: Direct instruction matters. Lectures can be the spark that lights a fuse (we all love TED talks for a reason). But, are we giving enough time, space and support for deep application of that lecture to happen? #Masterychat (I’m Eric from @GOAlearning. Sorry for being late!)
A1 - Lecture works in some small cases, but students learn better by doing and mastering ideas by discussion, building and creating. Students need to work and build with a teacher, not against them. #masterychat
A1: Lecture: Necessary evil made so by the novice's level. Not my favorite thing to do. . .I would really like to get down to the work that we will do all year long. Lecturing is a lonely work. Done by one. Shared from the silo that stands in the corner of the room. #masterychat
A1: I’m a believer in changing things up every 15 minutes or so. Especially from teacher centered to student centered. I failed at modeling this with my staff on opening day as I had them sit while I talked. It wasn’t my plan. I wasn’t happy with myself. #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1 - Lecture can work. Playing games can work. Singing can work. Drawing can work. Socratic questioning can work. And all of it can fail. What works for the child? What fits the skill set of the teacher? #masterychat
Q1: I like my Ss to be decisive, so I will be too. Anti-lecture! Even adults have short attn spans. I’m a fun and goofy, but they still zone out. Learning is about practice, failure, learning from that failure, collaboration, repeat... #masterychat
A1: I only truly lecture to dual credit (college... sorry).
All other courses I try to keep my talk time to 5-10 min, then let them work, then come back to me talking again!
Lecturing with graphic organizers or interactive notebooking helps break monotony! #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1 I am pro-lecture! I “lecture” for a total of 15-20 min every other class. The “lecture” also includes discussion, cold calls, debate, modeling, note-taking, scaffolding, laughter, etc. I use direct instruction to introduce topics, and it works so well with my Ss. #masterychat
I think lectures, if used, need to be short. I believe students need to discover their learning instead of just “receiving “ the knowledge from the teacher. #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1: Against lecture. Being a SPED teacher, the students I work closely with need to be engaged more with what is being taught and expected of them to learn. "Sit and Get" does not help them! #MasteryChat
Sure. I lecture on all things psychology, since almost all of the material is new to learners. I use direct instruction with discussion to decrease cognitive load. Lecture with discussion and retrieval practice. #MasteryChat
A1. You can lecture if you are entertaining and engaging, keep it quick to draw them in and also involve students in the process and provide other components to lessons. All the great Ted Talks or speeches against lecturing, guess how they do it. By lecturing...#masterychat
A1 - To some extent I think it depends on the subject. Some lend themselves to storytelling, for example, more than others. I do think it is important for teachers to Teach! We have knowledge to give along with times to coach. So not all day every day, but yes! #masterychat
A1) No. The learner plays a passive role in a lecture model. Perhaps it can be engaging if done well, but I can be engaged in an off-task activity. There are more factors involved in learning than just engagement. #masterychat
A1: I teach and in a 40 min period so the flipped classroom works best for my students and my class. I’m not the best at lecturing and understand most students wold rather be engaged while in the class. #masterychat
A1: we need to be wary of absolutes. Allowing the pendulum to swing too far to one side or another gets dangerous. So lecture has a place, even its drastically decreased #masterychat
I mean, I can think of lectures I've attended that have been done VERY well. So, short answer -- I'd say yes. Depends on lecturer, intent, goals, students, etc... #masterychat
#MasteryChat A1 In math, Direct Instruction aka Lecture is needed at times. REMEMBER YOUR STUDENTS HAVE A MEAGER ATTENTION SPAN. Probably around 5 to 10 minutes. Make each minute count. If you want the kids to REMEMBER the content, LECTURING IS THE WORST!
#Masterychat
A1: Against. Let's try a role play. Professional learning and training. Active learning and discovery or PPT and lecture? 90% student engagement in inquiry, PBL, SWRL (speaking writing reading listening) and P21. Learn by doing.
I mean, I can think of lectures I've attended that have been done VERY well. So, short answer -- I'd say yes. Depends on lecturer, intent, goals, students, etc... #masterychat
OK #MasteryChat.... Q2 is up in just a minute, so while your waiting, take this poll!
Your final answer on lecture is?
(Yes, I intentionally only put 2 options- make a choice!)
Levels are not the most important part of the book. Ss need to enjoy the book and talk about it with others, it should be a high quality text. Great webinar! @FountasPinnell#FPliteracy
A1 I teach 1st grade, so lecture doesn’t really apply. We have short mini lessons with Turn and Talk built in during whole group. I try to limit the T talk. #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1. It depends, @ the HS level I think we must prepare our Ss for college but it should not be the primary means of instruction becuz it matches only a few learning styles. #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
If you don't....from time to time...give a short lecture and model how to do it well, please don't expect Ss to present their student-choice, place-based learning project very well. They haven't SEEN a good model! #masterychat
An understanding of the purpose of lecture It needs to have a purpose that Ss can understand & material that puts Ss in positions of thinking differently #masterychat
A1(ish): I'm feeling like there are lots of different definitions of lecture here. Is it the same as whole class instruction? What's your definition of lecture? (And there's a whole other discussion we could have about the connotation of the word) #masterychat
A S told me a T said, "Not that book, it's not your level."
I was upset for that S because it was almost a judgment against them.
If a S wants to read a book LET THEM. We want to encourage a lifelong love of reading and cannot do that with comments such as these.
#masterychat
In reply to
@TechieTeachOtt, @CRCarter313, @NowakRo
A1: There can be a balance. I have a lot of insight on the topics that I teach, but I engage in conversation with my students during my lectures. We talk about the lecture topic or slide and then they paraphrase our conversation in their notes. #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A1: I like the flipped classroom for history because most students don’t like the history lectures so I try to keep class time for engaged learning and the more difficult higher order thinking work. #masterychat
To lecture well:
- know your audience
- change up your voice usage
- move, interact, use visuals
- mix up sentence styles, lengths (use questioning)
- know when to transition
#masterychat
I'd love to get the three of you together on a live video over in our facebook group at some point. I imagine there would be some amazing conversation happening! #masterychat
True statement with regards to 5-10min. I don't think the term "lecture" is interpreted in that manner though. When I hear the term I think in longer terms. When I teach for 5-10min I consider it more of a hook or a mini lesson #masterychat
A1: as a former history teacher lecture was always something I enjoyed. It's important to remember if it benefits the students. Great lectures can be extremely beneficial but depends on delivery & student needs. We can't always deliver a one size fits all model. #Masterychat
A1: Lecture plays the role of preserving the storytelling element of history in my classroom. It allows me to tap into the past with methods from the past. Everything in moderation though. #masterychat
A1 lecturing is the most preferred delivery of material in universities, yet active/engaged learning is most recommended by those who are considered education experts I say pick the best tool for the learning situation and mix things up a bit along the way #masterychat
A1. Lecture can occur, but keep it short within 5-8 minutes. Where Ss have time to be engaged in learning with hands on activities, experiments, designing, building, creativity, etc. #masterychat
Again, at all level our goal is to inspire and promote an environment that helps studfgtscto love learning. Any style can be beneficial if used correctly. #masterychat
I think there is a difference b/n lecture & whole group instruction. Maybe they are similar with mild differences. I teach whole group by demonstrating strategies 2 Ss.Then we might do 1 together&then they go practice it. A lecture doesn't seem as collaborative. #masterychat
A1: If I only get to choose one method of teaching for a lesson?against. If I get to blend?-for.
Yo can use it to set the foundation and get everyone going in the same direction. Then shift gears to the more action be learning. #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A2 there is a purposeful standardized testing, one we don’t actually tend to use the tests to accomplish. It shouldn’t take up so much of the kids time thought #masterychat
A2. Just like lecture, testing has its place. We need to stop making it the end-all. With that being said...test scores really just let us know who is good at taking tests. Not what they have learned. #masterychat
Hate them. 1) done during instructional time. 2) Ss internalize bad results as a measure of their learning/worth. 3) doesn’t accurately measure what they know that isn’t on the test. 4) expensive. #MasteryChat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
How long do you typically lecture for? And how old are your students? I feel like this topic has such varied perspectives depending on the age of students being taught...
Having taught everything from 3rd through 10th grade, I have seen that firsthand! #masterychat
A2 Currently? VERY harmful to learning. As a child of the testing generation, I just wonder what my school experience would have been like without that "Big Scary Thing" looming over me every year... There are other ways to monitor progress #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
It all depends on the audience and situation. TED is generally geared towards adults, not elem Ss. There are also lots of TED talks that I wouldn't sit through. #masterychat
A2: as long as everyone knows, and remembers, that standardized tests are just one piece of the puzzle, they can be a great benefit. They can provide useful information but again, we can't always rely on one size fits all models. #Masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A2: Standardized tests measure SOME progress and SOME types of learning. They are also harmful to student motivation, confidence, and can cause anxiety. Tests like that can’t measure work ethic or all types of intelligence. #MasteryChat
A2 Standardized testing is a great way to gather data but it is drastically mis-used, and in-utilized due to delay in reporting and multiple other issues with it’s delivery. If simplified Standardized tests could be much more beneficial but NOT in their current form #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
Great points but I'm not convinced many students learn best from lectures. Mini-lessons and think-alouds, for sure. Full lectures - you'll lose a majority of your class and have no enduring understanding. #MasteryChat
To lecture well:
- know your audience
- change up your voice usage
- move, interact, use visuals
- mix up sentence styles, lengths (use questioning)
- know when to transition
#masterychat
A2: Standardized tests are a waste of time and money. More kids learn to hate learning because they are only being prepped for tests. I have yet to encounter a standardized test outside of the realm of school. If it’s not applicable, it must go. #masterychat
A2: There are not enough characters for me to express my abhorrence for them. I get anxiety over taking the PSSA admin test and the ALICE test because I can’t do multiple choice. Failed written drivers test 2x but did very well in AP classes. #truestory#masterychat
#MasteryChat A2 IMO Standardized Testing is one of the few ways to "measure" the output of our lessons. HOWEVER... These tests DON'T measure the most important quality of a person, which is WHO THEY ARE! and the morality (hopefully) ROLED MODELED by the Tr.
A2: Definitely standardized tests can be used to drive instruction in a meaningful way. IF the assessment is valid and aligned to standards. But...are they being used that way???? #masterychat
A2 I'm against the testing! We teach our Ss where they are, and continue to help them climb, then at the end of the year we put them in a box and say take this test...What is that? Pressure on teachers, students, and confused parents. No, no, no #masterychat
I have no problem with the concept of standardized tests. Checking accomplishment across a broad population can be beneficial. But one has to imagine standardized testing VERY different than how it's currently practiced here in the US of A. #masterychat
A2 Standardized testing could be awesome if the results were used to monitor progress, rather than just be summative (thinking about ACT, and end of year state tests) #Masterychat
A2: potential for good if done well bcuz of access to data to measure growth & efficacy, but the current system is atrocious (and it’s better than the last system!) #masterychat
When do we take standardized tests in our lives as professionals or citizens? Rarely. The proportion of testing in schools should reflect its role in our lives. #Masterychat
A2 Last year our kinders were required to take more cycles of computer based testing than previous years. It created anxiety in some students... They didn't even know how to hold a mouse yet and that was part of the frustration for b them #MasteryChat
A1). I think direct instruction is good and needed but research on attention spans must be considered. HS is about 12-15 mins. Especially in math, students need a opportunity to practice often after shorter spurts of instruction. #MasteryChat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A2. Eek,depends what standards you are using possibly? I think there’s a difference between state mandated testing like the PARCC & formative assessments that teachers & students can design for themselves. In a way they can still establish individualized standards #MasteryChat
Hear, hear! I (@AlbaMcCance) am with you Blake.
Even in the primary/elementary setting - direct instruction & mini lectures are really powerful when used purposefully... teaching relevant vocabulary or guided reading session for example. #MasteryChat#SuperbSchools#PrimaryRocks
In reply to
@effortfuleduktr, @TechieTeachOtt, @AlbaMcCance
A2 - I don't love standardized testing. It judges students on a single measure, but it also can damage teachers as well. I would really love to see a shift, at least in my discipline to portfolios and measures that follow the recursive nature of learning. #masterychat
Tiffany - Kansas City (taught 9 years) now living in California (taught 1 year) - I think it might just be school shootings in regards to preventative measures. #masterychat
A2 - Simple, all things are not equal. There are too many variables to use a standardized test effectively. Yes for some students it works, but they would be successful with most methods. We should be looking at growth as a key measure. #masterychat
A2: My thoughts about standardized testing are influenced by the true story from my eight-year old. At bedtime after stories and hugs, "Mom, are the state tests super hard?' #masterychat
A2: I feel it’s only one aspect of the full picture of a student. It’s upsetting when it’s tied to funding and more like a business mindset. #masterychat
A2: Loathe! Districts put pressure on Ts who put pressure on Ss and parents are thrown in the battle as well! Data on a standardized test doesn't give as important info as discussion/creativity/hands-on/etc... #MasteryChat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
Hey #masterychat! I'm jumping in late. Had a fussy toddler on my hands. :)
Stella, Instructional Technology Coordinator from KY here and ready to learn.
A2: What do you mean by standardized? They are valuable if they are created by teachers to assess targets created by teachers and those teachers evaluate the data to take informed instructional action. #masterychat
A2) Its nice to know where a student is at in the beginning of the year and through out but I think its hard to have a true look at a student and sometimes they are not as authentic if at all. I know I have found it troubling for ELL students. #masterychat
A2: A couple of thoughts:
1. There's a difference between standardized testing and high-stakes standardized testing. The two have been conflated in the larger debate.
2. It's important from an equity standpoint. I'd argue a net positive for students of color.
#masterychat
A2: We talk about "teaching to the test." This is the WHO and WHAT. And notice that we can always make time and room (WHEN and WHERE). But. . .we're so TEST-Y. That pesky "Y." The WHY of testing most often eludes us in conversations around instruction. So. . .WHY? #masterychat
And so much of it is dependent on how long the lecture is, the flow of content, etc. and that's not even taking into account what's happening in a kid's life at that moment! #masterychat
It all depends on the audience and situation. TED is generally geared towards adults, not elem Ss. There are also lots of TED talks that I wouldn't sit through. #masterychat
Hmmm hard to pick a side. I think everything has its place BUT it’s important not to over do it. Not all lectures are bad and I remember learning a lot as a student from lectures. We also need to take age into consideration and sooo many other things.
A2: What does standardized mean..Differentiated? Not even close, but let's continue the requirement of standardized tests for all learners: english language, special needs, not performing at grade level, etc. #NotAFan#MasteryChat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A2:
Too much. Booooo! Trust us to teach our standards. However with testing, benchmarks, SLOs, test prep, and in and on—where’s the time to teach those standards? And for non-tested classes— time is taken so the “important” classes don’t lose more time. #masterychat
A2: tough one! As a T, I kind of like it-look at it as an end of year challenge & really build my kids up to overcome it. Ive seen great results w/ Ss who have not had much success in the past-however I don't like how much pressure is put on schools from top
#masterychat
A2. Standardized testing is based on curriculum that is supposed to be taught in the classroom! Yes, it is stressful for Ss, often time consuming. The data generated does give information to show the learning growth of the Ss and curriculum covered. #masterychat
Wow! #masterychat q/a are flying!!! Here are my thoughts on the first two. All or nothing on either of these issues negates the positives that exist in both. IMHO it's the implementation of both lecture and standardized testing that tends to be polarizing - not the "tool" itself.
A2: There has to be a better way to measure learning. Back when we were kids, standardized testing was just once a year, now students have multiple tests throughout the year and it's detrimental. Students and teachers are burnt out! #masterychat
A2: I support them with an *. Having worked in the nuclear industry, benchmarking with training depts from other plants was crucial for improvement.
Use them as a reflection and benchmarking tool and remove ties to funding and teacher evaluation and I'm in. #MasteryChat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A1-A2 - Teaching and instruction is finding the Art and Science blended together. Many students forget what they’ve learned after graduating because it truly wasn’t interesting to them. Getting students to love learning solves testing and instruction. #masterychat
When Ts focus on addressing the necessary SKILLS, students can succeed at any test.
At the end of the year, learners will value the skills more than the scores.
#MasteryChat
Interesting thoughts! Tell me what you consider the difference between the two. (I have my own thoughts, but would love to hear yours.)
Also, how do you ensure that a standardized test remains out of the high stakes arena? #masterychat
A2: A professor emailed me last year that a student did not know me or my ability like she did. Students are so much more than a score. You cannot assess kindness, etc. #MasteryChat
My question too. I feel like there could be differences, but I'm not 100%. College professors lecture, & I feel that's different than me teaching a 5-10 min. strategy lesson. Also, John Hattie's work tells us that direct instruction is effective. #masterychat
A2). If we focus on teaching our course’s objectives and only use it as a way to grow and improve the next year — great. If that one day snapshot is our end goal and focus for our instruction — ⚠️! #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A2b: When we require standardized tests, we are deflating any amount of confidence many students have once they receive their scores or get placed in supportive classes before their low performance. Some Ts begin to only teach to the test (3rd problem) #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A2: #MasteryChat We need to accurately gauge growth (or lack of) thruout the yr. But 4 "benchmarks", PSSA, identical assessments across schools is just wayyyy too much!!! Don't know the answer, but there has to be a better way.
I had a 7th grade biology teacher that was almost entirely lecture based. But this guy was the best darn lecturer I have ever seen and I sat riveted in my seat. The problem I see, however, is that a lot of people THINK they are riveting lecturers, but they aren't. #masterychat
My best lecture-based teachers were really story tellers. I especially remember a professor of philosophy. Had to take his class my last semester of undergrad. Was not interested in the class at all until he engaged us with his examples and stories. Became a fav class.
A2. pt 2 I struggle with the length of the tests, the amount of time that it takes to administer them, and the language that is used in them. All seem pretty prohibitive to me and I have never felt that it fully measures progress beyond regurgitation #masterychat
I know this is dumb... but my issue with Standardized Tests is often the frequency and interruption in the classroom more than anything else #masterychat
A3: I think homework should be things families can do together. Like: Making connections from the class material to their night, reading with a family, etc. Nothing should be forced. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
#Masterychat
A2: Assessment FOR learning. Being lucky overseas, my schools actually have committed to using MAP testing data to really direct learning and try to be innovative with approaches. Teachers are not scapegoats. We learn and fail together and try to make classrooms rich
A2. Standardized Testing really teaches us to teach to the test. We are given pacing guides, CFAs, and the like to keep us on the "right" path. What Schools Can Be, by @dintersmith or @melhawk46 Model. Both of these discuss a true change in education. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3. Less homework. Unless your in my band. You should be practicing right now! Let kids be kids. Work them hard during the day. Let them have their nights. #masterychat
Standardized tests are used to assess curriculum on a large scale. Are we missing things as a district?
Not for whatever nonsense they’ve been corrupted into these days. #MasteryChat
A3: I am so personally against hw. That also has something to do with my subject (ELA). We read in class. We write in class. We discuss in class. If you don’t finish your work, yes, catch up at home. But focus in my class and you’ll be fine. #masterychat
A1. It’s something I rarely do, because I want to encourage & support the challenge of exploration. However, I saw a lecture by @DrChrisKukk and it’s challenging ME to rethink the way lectures can inspire and excite Ss! #Masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A3: I don’t give much homework, but when I do it is always low stakes. Note taking, vocabulary, things that eat up time in the classroom. I want my Ss doing real math in the classroom so that they don’t hate math, I want them to feel supported! #Masterychat
A3: For the most part, ditch it. I haven't read ANY recent research that supports homework as improving student achievement. Of course, like with lectures, there's no ONE answer. In some situations, my answer might change:) #masterychat
A2 - STests have a place. It's what we do with the results that make it good or bad. Here's the thing. It's a cheap way 4the state to dip in 2c if Ss are learning the standards. But it's wholly insufficient. Wholly. It's like looking through a fogged up windshield. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
1/2 For example, I remember taking the CAT in high school, but it wasn't high stakes. No state letter or numerical designation. Results were not tied to evaluations or compensation. #masterychat
I think homework should be tweaked. How about, find a book you love and read it to/with a family member? Take a trip to your local library and place a book on hold and pick it up when available. Yes HW can help Ss practice, but hours of this is unnecessary.
#masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3: None in elem except to read anything of interest (but no logs or required minutes) .. and at upper grades, we need to discuss WHY and WHAT. Just to prepare kids for college load is not okay. #MasteryChat
#MasteryChat GREAT QUESTIONS! A3 As a math Tr, to get enough repetition to master the problems, usually doing some of the problems at home is necessary. However, I do my best to let my Ss WORK TOGETHER in class and TEACH EACH OTHER (See controversial pyramid). #ItWorks
A3 part 2: Less homework for the kids = more class time. Not having to review the previous nights' homework, not having to collect and distribute... PLUS more time to leave feedback on assignments that matter. Win Win WIN!!!!!! #masterychat
A3. All depends on the definition of what HW is. If it’s a worksheet or rote practice. Boo that. If it’s to interview their Great grandparents who immigrated from Germany during WW2 to help them understand the Holocaust, then HW becomes meaningful & experience based #MasteryChat
2/2 Today, it would be tough to keep it completely out of the high stakes arena, but states (under #ESSA) are moving in the direction of not relying solely on them when making high stakes decisions. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A4: I daily praise homework that consists of: playing outside, reading a good book, and talking with families about everyone's day. As for traditional homework, I ditched that years ago. #masterychat
A3 I have done my best to get rid of as much homework as I can, but sometimes it just has to happen. The same way that I sometimes have to bring work home because I was less focused, my kids do too. Only AP classes get content at home every night. #masterychat
I am actually a really big fan of MAP testing! It can be so powerful, but I still see a lot of teachers and districts not using it to its potential or using it for punitive or high stakes purposes. I wish more people understood the potential impact of adaptive tests! #masterychat
#Masterychat a1 There is a claim that lectures are a social venture. Yes, googled it, but really it's just economically cheap. The tute (20-30 students) is much more informative, esp. for clarification.
A2: Feedback for NJ isn't quick so the data & reflection isn't optimal. As a parent I don't mind the concept of learning how to take a test& putting your best effort forth. My son has taken PARCC for two years and understands that sometimes you have to take tests #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A3 I think Homework in the traditional form shouldn’t be a thing. Kids should read daily and discuss their reading. Research seems to back that up in elementary #Masterychat
A3 - Homework with purpose and meaning. I try to give students time in class to work, but most of the time, if I give homework I try to make a meaningful assignment that engages them past the classroom rather than just busy work. #masterychat
A3: Research shows homework has a small effect size (.22-.29) in elementary schools & slightly more effective in MS & HS. Homework MUST be purposeful & something the Ss can do on their own to further their learning. Read a book is always my go to! #masterychat#Hattie
A3 - As with all the previous answers, there is rarely a clear answer. If we are promoting mastery of certain topics, then practice at home may be necessary. In most instances though this isn’t what HW dies effectively. As I’ve mentioned, we must look at the”why!” #masterychat
A3) Should be ditched especially at the elementary level. Allow kids to be kids and offer research/StEM projects based on students interests #masterychat
A3 #masterychat My take on homework is tied to purpose/age. There is enough research to say that it's not effective at certain grade levels. But, I think there are times when it can be purposeful. I would like to see more reflection metacognitive work about what they know.
A3: On the fence. Parents can see what ss are learning and whether they are struggling. I always said don’t spend more than 15 min on it. Email me and let me know it took longer. (2nd grade)I dont give it in MS. Like the idea of conversations instead of worksheets #masterychat
A3) Ditch it. Reading should be mandatory, but aside from that, we should suggest family games & activities (and let families decide if they want to do it or not). Kids need time to be kids. Do we want to go home and spend hours more working? Not really. Not at all. #masterychat
Such a waste of money! In Texas where our state funding is decreasing every year, I’d love to have that standardized testing money for more teachers, pd, etc. #MasteryChat
A2: Standardized tests are a waste of time and money. More kids learn to hate learning because they are only being prepped for tests. I have yet to encounter a standardized test outside of the realm of school. If it’s not applicable, it must go. #masterychat
Well, @joykirr, your are right! That is a great follow up question!
Ok, #masterychat folks. How do YOU (or could you) get quality, accurate feedback on how you are doing when you DO lecture?
Mastery Classrooms with Self Paced Framework, students assign themselves work outside of the classroom. Do you need to do a little extra to make it stick? No worries, lets do that! #masterychat
A3: As HS T in small district I don't "homework" - our kids are too busy!
If they don't finish in class (time management) they may have to finish outside of class.
Dual credit has outside work bc COLLEGE!
As Parent, wish my kid had a little so I can be involved! #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
As long as it is ungraded practice and not considered mastery or just finishing up something started in class, I feel it’s fine. Don’t penalize it for behavior, it’s about the learning practice. #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3 I always provided suggestions of things to do w. fam that tied into what we were learning in class. Ex: keep a 'journal' of the Moon for a few nights - go observe 🌟 w. fam. If it had a turn in piece, it was never due next day. #masterychat
As long as the time is short and the lecturer is engaging... The challenge is often in determining how engaged the learners are and how deep the lecture impact is... How much learning is occurring with passive listening and no opportunity to engage? #Masterychat
In reply to
@TheStephenKeys, @effortfuleduktr, @emilyfranESL
A2- not a fan of standardized testing as it doesn’t measure creativity, collaboration, innovation, curiosity, and kills the spirit of education for too many kids #masterychat
A3: Another one that can be useful when “done well.” Of course, that’s too often not the case. Like when, for example, it’s used in an attempt to teach new content (a big no-no in my book). #masterychat
A3 I am leaning more against hw every year. If I’m going to give it it’s not very often and it’s in the flipped format. Flipped allows students to do it quickly, and best of all they are never confused on how to do it. Save complex work for classroom #masterychat
A3 I think homework can be used to build responsibility to help students with scheduling time to bring school and home together But excessive homework for the sake of giving homework is just simply unnecessary #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3-Homework can mean so many things to different people. In our class on our home page I often suggest various games families couple play to reinforce specific contents. It’s not mandatory- however family fun and practice is encouraged on nights they have some time. #MasteryChat
Research shows no benefit to hw in early ed, benefits when done well and with appropriate purpose in HS. I use it as no-stakes practice....no grade. But I also think it's vital to provide opportunities for Ss to practice retrieval outside the classroom walls. #masterychat
A1: This is a tough one. I see SOME benefits when it’s a tough topic that needs some major teacher direct instruction. However, our kids definitely learn better with more hands on learning #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
While I agree in theory, I also know that when something isn't required, it often isn't done. Especially in families in which parents might not have the skills or ability to understand the importance of such conversations. What, then, is a solution?
I don't know... #masterychat
My favorites (sarcasm) are benchmarks. Let’s test to see if we are ready for the test. Where’s the teaching time and seem less formative assessment? #masterychat
A3: It is common for students in HS to work at home, but the work should be on long running projects that have embedded student choice, are flexible about student voice and are enriched by classroom support. Any work at home should manifest deeply in the classroom. #masterychat
A3 There are peoplewho give meaningful and purposeful assignments for homework, I’m not one of them and I don’t know anyone who does in person. If you aren’t spending way too much time on it, it’s probably causing damage #masterychat
A3: Minimal homework- Read at least 30 mins. a night but I try not to make it "homework." I pitch it to them as making reading a part of their life! #masterychat#reading#5thgrade
That’s awesome. Wouldn’t have worked for my population as some students were latchkey kids, English learners,foster, etc. Was easier to just stay in my locust of influence in classroom and not send things home #masterychat
A3. It’s a bummer to ask a student what their plans are for a night and they respond, “homework”.... homework can drive students to dislike school. #masterychat
A3: HW doesn't hurt my feelings as long as teachers take into consideration all the other classes Ss take.
Can't give an hr of hw every night if a Ss other 5 teachers are doing the same thing. Shifting to weekly or biweekly assignments could be a nice compromise. #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
True BUT.... The kids who are doing the homework at home are the kids who understand the assignments. The kids who have parents that are either less involved or having to work 2+ jobs to make ends meet have no help. No one. So.... #DitchHW for me! :) #masterychat
That's what I love about the internet -- I may hate how my teacher tells the class about a topic, but I can go home and watch a video or listen to a podcast by someone who just does a better job explaining it for me (and that's okay!!) #masterychat
I have been meaning to write a blog post about the difference btw direct instruction & lecture (as it is often portrayed in a negative light). I think it would benefit Ts greatly to understand the distinction. Open this article in another tab and read it later! #masterychat
Listen to what your students have to say about your lecture. And if you’re lecturing “right”the students are going to be engaged and part of the communication process. you’ll know automatically. If you have to ask your not doing it right. #listentotheSs#masterychat
Well, @joykirr, your are right! That is a great follow up question!
Ok, #masterychat folks. How do YOU (or could you) get quality, accurate feedback on how you are doing when you DO lecture?
A3: For many of my students who work the hardest in the room to get it and to stay afloat, home IS work. I DO ask them to take the time in the room to center. To be present. To do more in here than at home. Here, we can work together. For too many, "Home's Alone." #masterychat
A1: Teacher-led delivery (lecture) can be beneficial in small doses...especially when introducing new content. Mini-lessons work great. Keep it short and sweet. And students should still be responsible for responding and engaging. #masterychat
There are some undoubted benefits to homework. Especially when we are restricted by reduced teaching hours and heavy content requirements.
How else do we tackle large amounts of content?
#masterychat#edchat
I teach 11th grade (American Lit.). I have learned that small discussions for intake and small breaks for processing help students retain the information more deeply. #masterychat
Podcasts and TedTalks are driven by choice. You elect to be an audience member.
Too many times, enrolled students don't have a choice other than to be trapped as lecture receivers from under-trained speakers.
#masterychat
A3b - My daughter has taken mostly AP and Honors classes. She has had large amounts if HW. While I’m not a fan, once students go to college, much of there time learning is outside of class. But, I personally am against HW in large amounts. #masterychat
A3. It’s a bummer to ask a student what their plans are for a night and they respond, “homework”.... homework can drive students to dislike school. #masterychat
Exact experience in my house w/my daughter. She strongly dislikes school which makes me sad. It primarily stems from years of having hours of homework nightly and through weekend. I too can't wait for it to be over! It sounds horrible, but... #masterychat
A3 #MasteryChat To be honest, HW just isn't worth the fight for me. I'd rather they do the work in my class. My only HW is to study for a quiz or finish what they didn't in class.
A2: This one I can voice that heck no! I HATE seeing a student that has shown massive personal academic growth throughout the year instantly crumble when they’re forced to take a test NOT on THEIR level!! #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
Research shows no benefit to hw in early ed, benefits when done well and with appropriate purpose in HS. I use it as no-stakes practice....no grade. But I also think it's vital to provide opportunities for Ss to practice retrieval outside the classroom walls. #masterychat
I respect fam time and football practice etc. HW shouldn't be a stresser that is squeezed into these things. Some Ps want the practice though, so if they want more than the ideas, I'll give other things as well. But, it all depends on the families wants #MasteryChat
A3: I hate homework! The kids should just go home and be kids. (Plenty of times parents will show students incorrectly too 😬). For some reason, parents are crazy about homework this year! Going crazy asking for it..? #MasteryChat
A1: I see no problem with lectures in small bursts. I directly instruct (and model) for about 15-20 min, then we break into a 45-min workshop (15min of independent reading at the very start of class. My instruction, explanation, & modeling preps before working 1-on-1 #Masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A3. Homework is not a bad thing. Often times Ss need practice in certain subjects with work and problem solving! Homework should not be given as busy work! It should have a purpose and a reason! Several hours nightly is crazy! #masterychat
I would still argue, however, that asking them anyway is valuable. I have known many Ts who truly believe they are exceptional lecturers whose Ss are really into what they are saying. These same Ts have Ss who come to me and bemoan the boring lectures. #masterychat
So @TechieTeachOtt , when is all the fighting gonna start? Seems like #masterychat is kinda on the same page tonight.
GREAT CHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
You know what's coming up? Question 4! Which means it is also time for another poll. :) #masterychat
You get three choices on this one (aren't I nice?)
What are your final thoughts on homework?
A2: I struggle with the time that students have to sit still and take these tests. Is that really developmentally appropriate? What kind of TKES score would we get if we gave 70 minute assessments, took a 10 min break, and then tested them for 70 more minutes. 😳 #masterychat
Depends on the podcasts you like! Personally I don’t listen to lectures and instead prefer podcasts where people are having great discussions! #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3) Agree. If students need more practice in math on a skill, I give hwk. If they get it, I don’t. They start in class where I and others can help & use home time to finish. They can always correct for full credit. It is practice after all. Mastery is the goal. #masterychat
Research shows no benefit to hw in early ed, benefits when done well and with appropriate purpose in HS. I use it as no-stakes practice....no grade. But I also think it's vital to provide opportunities for Ss to practice retrieval outside the classroom walls. #masterychat
A3: I want my students 2 read at night. That is most important. I do believe some level of work at home in the lower grades helps reinforce a skill that may be needed as well as to prepare 4 middle & high school. Setting a routine at a younger age can be beneficial #MasteryChat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
#Masterychat a3 @Dale_Chu has hit my point. Homework always seems to an euphamism for not finished. Do new work at home. Just no.
Now targeted practice works but I did it on yard duty. 1 minute goes a long way.
A3: I agree w/ homework as long as it will prepare Ss for what they can expect to see on the test when assessing for understanding, not mastery. I think if it's required, it should be short & also reviewed; never just turned in & not discussed (I've seen it happen) #MasteryChat
Yes, but I remember reading that it takes like 10 times as long to untrain and retrain the brain. And most don’t get feedback soon enough to stop the misconception 😒 #masterychat
A2: Valuable progress monitoring tools, yet should be used w/ caution. Testing is not teaching and I hate when it takes up so much time! Also makes me think of the teaching to the test vs. backwards design schools of thought. #MasteryChat
Great chat! Let’s always think about our goals of teaching. I still teach because I love seeing students smiling, laughing, interacting and learning in ways they enjoy. School should not be a place that is dreaded by students at any level. #masterychat
A3. Homework in my children's district is used for new learning, dreadful! In the district I work, optional, better. At the Elementary level, K-5, I do not think that homework is helpful, I think it is a detriment. #masterychat
A4: I think they're healthy.
As for the cons, they don't HAVE to contribute to testing culture, & we're not really limited in our flexibility to adjust to needs. They are goals to try to hit. Common lang. helps us to find resources and share what we believe works. #MasteryChat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A4 - National standards make absolute sense but what would make more sense is national (student friendly) learning objectives for teachers to focus on and students to interact with. Teachers spend HOURS in every district working on these separately...WHY? #masterychat
A3: Have Ss always hated homework? I remember loving school AND homework and I had tons of it! Was that just me? Lol..
Why the sudden (or gradual?) change? #masterychat
A3- the only homework I encouraged as principal was reading for pleasure. Its time to stop measuring education by the number of worksheets sent home by the school. Let kids be kids at home and read with your kids! #masterychat
I appreciate @Dale_Chu’s categorization of standardized v. High-stakes testing. As he notes, the two are used interchangeably, but they shouldn’t be #MasteryChat
A2: A couple of thoughts:
1. There's a difference between standardized testing and high-stakes standardized testing. The two have been conflated in the larger debate.
2. It's important from an equity standpoint. I'd argue a net positive for students of color.
#masterychat
Standards are important. A standardized test to measure understanding or skill against the standard acts in direct opposition to independent thought, creativity, curiosity, and innovation #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
High stakes testing-hmmm. Schools need accountability. But all we do is test. We counted 20 “required from district” tests-in elem. not are they lrng But can they test. So not what learning should be. #masterychat
#MasteryChat A4 Common Core is a slippery slope. Read some Common Core history books. OPINIONS are being stated as facts. This is a slippery slope toward indoctrination. Keep learning standards at the state level.
A3: #MasteryChat
1. HW never guarantees it's the Ss work.
2. Limited evidence
3. If we are truly workshopping/striving for 90%engagement, kids will be mentally tired/need rest
4. Try following a student for a day in a school that promotes active learning. Then ask if you want HW
Depends on if you like the class or not? IF you like social studies, you probably wouldn't mind a social studies lecture. I hated social studies and hate historical podcasts also. BUT talk to me about an interest, I'm zoned in. #masterychat
A4 does is really limit the ability to adjust for needs?
I like the idea of consistency across States but when states like FL change them (even if ever so slightly) are they truly consistent? #masterychat
A1: Not the most effective method in elementary school. Max attention span for even the most interesting lecture could be maybe 15min? That’s even a stretch. Engagement is best! Student centered w/ rigor when possible. #MasteryChat
A3: Homework:
1. Read, read, read what you love and enjoy.
2. Practice some math facts or even better...some authentic math (sorting, counting, handling money)
3. Be a kid. Laugh, play, and have fun! #masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A4: We don't do common core at my school so I'm honestly not familiar.
But I don't like anything that takes the uniqueness away from Ts or Ss. #masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
I agree. I find that when I discuss national standards in a positive light with other teachers and they disagree, they tend to view them as shackles and limits, rather than guidemaps and a GPS. Standards let me go on a great adventure in learning with my studnets! #masterychat
A4 Not all bad. As long as the teacher in the room is trusted to make the decisions for the best interest of the students in the room. Changes year to year #masterychat
A3: No way I could say it better than @DouglasReeves "Why do teachers assign homework? “Because the students need practice.” OK - then what are the hallmarks of effective practice? Feedback, coaching, differentiation. Does that EVER happen with homework?" #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A4 Counter-questions: Are they content standards? Personal growth standards? Decent human being standards? Are they arbitrary? Only two of those really matter to me and we don't assess or reflect on either of them... #masterychat
True. How feedback is done does impact that. I do a flip class so they work on things in class and I check understanding in the moment so they get verbal feedback instantly. #Masterychat
A3: IF I give students something to work on at home, we will use it during the next class session. Every assignment is a formative that directly guides students towards mastery of a concept or skill, and students are learning the value of their assigned task. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A3: With homework, less is definitely more. Kids spend all day at school, they need time for self-care (as do all humans). The only "homework" my students have is to read a book they've chosen. #masterychat#kidsarepeopletoo
#masterychat That's very similar to how my class works. But, it's never graded. My hwk is also spiraled w/old material to practice retrieval. My philosophy: If you CAN do 8, you can do 20. If you can't do 8, you can't do 20. So why would I ever give you more than 8 of the same?
A4: I honestly feel I’m not educated enough to make this choice. I went through college when common core was introduced so it’s been all I know. Would love to hear y’all’s thoughts!! #masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
Interesting perspective. I would argue, however, that a set of standards does not need to take any uniqueness away from teachers and students. For me, standards give me a map and then together my students and I determine how to explore the region. #masterychat
There are some undoubted benefits to homework. Especially when we are restricted by reduced teaching hours and heavy content requirements.
How else do we tackle large amounts of content?
#masterychat#edchat
...definitely guilty of that when I was in HS, but in all honesty it was probably because I allocated more time to my other HW. It's a vicious cycle... #masterychat
I definitely get that sentiment. I think if it's framed and used right we can get past the crumbling though.
If we used the same test beginning, middle and end and didn't tie it to their grade, Ss could see their growth w/o fear of failure. #MasteryChat
A1:I think as part of a blended learning model, it plays a role. We have master storytellers who engage our students in history re-enactments through words...gripping and engaging, then they challenge them to think critically about the topic #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A4) National Standards are a good idea, so that ALL kids are learning about the same things. However, these standards can become political and thats where it becomes a slippery slope #masterychat
A4: I think it makes some sense that Ss in one part of the country at a certain age are learning what others learn in another part of the country at the same age. Give the framework, let the Ts fill in the how to #masterychat
This is tough, especially since I work in sped. Past of me sees the advantage in national standards setting a unified educational front. The other part of me recognizes how many Ss get left behind bc of the push to move on with curriculum whether Ss are ready or not.
#masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
The national standards should be few and agreed upon by THE NATION, IMO. It is reasonable that communities in rural Montana might emphasize different skills than they would in Miami. That's not just ok....it's GOOD! Hooray diversity! #masterychat
A4: Its interesting that we utilize these National Standards, yet things still differ among states. It’s important to have alignment with our teaching though. #masterychat
Have you tried graphic novels? or audio books?
And honestly, a lot of being an active reader goes toward how much the family is practicing at home. We love books so I always get my girl to read at least once a day. #masterychat
A4: If created by teachers with experience in the classroom. A collaboration of teachers from all the states addressing the needs and having a contingency plan for when deviation might be needed. #Masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A4. There are different paths to the same destination. Look at YOUR students and determine how you can help them reach the common destination.
#masterychat
A4) I;m okay w/national standards. Makes sense. We can expect the same skill sets and competencies across the board, but differ the content to make it relevant to the individual state. Content should not be the end goal; content is merely the means to the end goal. #masterychat
A4. Teaching in a district with a lot of S turnover, consist success markers would be important. However there is something to be said for local standards as well. #masterychat
A4: I’m not against national standards. Really don’t mind common core. It’s become less of a shock that when it was first pushed. I see more pushback from the elementary and from Math. It ties well into History. #masterychat
A4 - I like the guidance of Standards. It helps to maintain continuity of different grades across schools. However, there needs to be some room for adaptation and creativity from the teacher's end. #masterychat
I agree in part with your perspective, I also see Ts that don't progress monitor to plan next steps in learning. I think that testing attempts to force some data analysis, which is good, but I'm not 100% convinced it's the right approach. #masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
On behalf of military & migratory families, I don’t think learning should be dictated by where you live. But there should be so@e opportunities to infuse local issues/history/etc to natl standards #MasteryChat
A4: I've taught after the standards movement and before it. I like the guidance that standards provide for students across grade levels and classrooms. If they hinder creativity and all of other goodness, that's really mine to own, not an standards issue. #masterychat
A4 There have to be some kind of standards and expectations on achievement. Do they need to be reinvented for 21st century skills probably #Masterychat
Maybe it's the kind of homework students are being asked to do? Maybe it doesn't match up with their life experiences anymore and they are struggling with cognitive dissonance? I know I always struggled with that... #masterychat
Would you advocate for tracking this process, like in a daily reading log, or just recommending it to students and parents? I've heard pros and cons to both approaches... #masterychat
They work for those that learn best that way. A lecture can have all the components for all learners, as can a podcast, but small group is better for foundation skills. #masterychat
A4 - National standards work as a guide of what we think think students should know. What happens though when many studrvrscdint reach the criteria. This looks like NCLB again. #masterychat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A4 I'm a military brat and went to 6 elementary schools and did not have any issues. My district is pretty transient and the only issue I have ever had is trying to catch new babies up on Va. history if new 2 the state. We are not CC #masterychat
A4. National standards can be troublesome, who specifically develops them? Educators, politicians & for what purpose? Shame states, impact funding etc. #masterychat
A4: From a policy standpoint, yes. Reading & math in WA shouldn’t be totally different than in FL.
From a political standpoint, it’s a disaster (i.e. federalism). The #CCSS rollout should have been done much differently. But most states still have higher standards. #masterychat
Do you think there may be any way to keep the homework AND make it equitable? I don't know the answer to that. I have my thoughts, but I am curious what you two think. #masterychat
A4: Standards are helpful. They provide consistency, especially in today's society were people are often moving from place to place. However, it's the focus on standardized testing and the lack of trust and autonomy for professional educators that is destructive. #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A4: I believe there should be national standards for all students to ensure continuity amongst states. However, TRUE educational leaders need to be the ones to create these standards & then allow the states/schools to implement and meet how they see fit for them #masterychat
YOU. ARE. ALL. AMAZING! Make sure that you are finding someone to disagree with and striking up conversation. Let's all learn together. :) #masterychat
A1: TEDtalks works bc its sought out by adults invested in the topic, therefore are fully engaged in its content. Lecture to Ss who did not seek out the content is difficult bc Ss not invested. Curric can be delivered in many more engaging ways than lecture. #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A5 - Retakes...Seriously do we care WHEN they know it or THAT they know it! Every real world “Important” assessment allows this GRE, MCAT, LSAT, SAT, ACT...What argument is there to not allow this?! #masterychat
A4: I'm gonna go way off the reservation here but stick with me 😂
IMO the federal Dept of Ed should be relegated to a best practices advisory board with no authority over curriculum whatsoever.
Benchmark, research, recommend but let the states do their thing. #MasteryChat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A4. National standards are important for all schools. If you transfer from one school to another school, you should be in the same area of content because of the national standards. #masterychat
A4: I think it’s important to have guidelines on what students have to learn. If we didn’t have standards, we might end up teaching just what we think is important or what we like. #MasteryChat
Q4 National standards (common core-esque). Should we have them? Should we not?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Consistency btw states
-Roadmap for Ts
-Ts across the country can share resources
Cons:
-Contributed to testing culture
-Limited flexibility to adjust to needs
#masterychat
A3: I love the notion of "fun homework": homework that doesn't look like homework.
Optional tasks like #shelfies, like "learn something new & share it with the class." Thinking tasks sparked by engaging topics or discussions. But quick, short, fun, ungraded. #masterychat
Q3 Homework? Ditch homework? More? Less? What do you think?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Encourages parental involvement in learning
-Provides practice
-Can teach time management
Cons:
-Limits play
-Evidence for effectiveness is limited
-Parents may not be supportive
#masterychat
A5: I’m a fan if the alternative is for students to simply move on to the next topic without mastery. This is where personalized learning holds promise. #masterychat
I guess it depends. When I lecture I have a purpose. While the experience is personal my goal is to have similar outcomes.
With my pod I don’t have an intended outcome. #masterychat
A5:
I LOVE Retakes! (Especially in WRITING!!)
Pros OUTWEIGH the cons IMO!
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
If retakes make Ss practice retrieval, I say they are a way to promote a growth mindset & make the class a safe place to make mistakes, and a merciful class for when Ss get bogged down by life. Retakes are NOT helpful is S just comes in and regurgitates corrections. #masterychat
A5: Retakes all the way. The point of school is getting Ss to show what they know. Can't find that out if you don't give them the opportunity #masterychat
A5: Retakes can be a valuable tool to help all with assessing knowledge. Shows a growth model and is focused on improvement. I required proof of practice before I let s's retest but gave them chances comparable to my professional experiences. #Masterychat
A3 #masterychat I am totally against hw. If a S feels as though they would like to practice at home that is great. With my own children it does more harm than good. Kids should have the opportunity to go home and do other things - they have been at work all day!!
A5. I saw a tweet from @alicekeeler a few months ago about retakes. It resonated with me. She said We offer retakes for driving tests, MCATS, PRAXIS, BAR and that’s to certify drivers, doctors, teachers, & lawyers. Why not give kids multiple chances to be kids? #MasteryChat
Sorry, I just mean in general. I'm saying lectures don't work, but I am also realizing I have a podcast addiction. Therefore, I need to look into this a little more b/c clearly some lectures do work for me and many others. #masterychat
#MasteryChat
A3 https://t.co/UFc1A7bOJk
A vision for StandardsBasedLearning around GlobalCompetence:
GlobalCitizenshipIndicators (or MYP Global Contexts)
SDG targets (standards: the why PBL)
Content Standards/Objectives (ex Common Core: skills)
Language Objectives:EAL/bilingual
That’s awesome for your state. My ex’s son lost a year of instruction and repeated a grade because of gaps in learning between Alaska and Cali. 😑 #masterychat
I'm not supporting the testing, by any means. I just appreciate the guidance - especially for those new to teaching. IDK who makes the standards, or how standard they actually are; I do like the GPS-ness of them. #MasteryChat
A5 - 100% for retakes. If a student cannot do a project or assessment, then how can we expect the student to be able to understand and work the material. I want students to have the experience first in order to understand the material. #masterychat
A5: Growth over everything. My Ss can’t retake certain assignments, but CW, essays..yes! Edit that work! Make it better! You’ve worked hard in class but still can’t get it? Yeah. Let’s practice. #masterychat
A5: retesting gives the students a chance to self-reflect on their score, relearn and fix any misconceptions, and a chance to feel confident with the content before moving on. We shouldn't leave students behind just because they didn't get it the first time around. #masterychat
A5: Since students all learn at the same rate and pace and come to us with the same background knowledge.... do we really need retakes? (heavy sarcasm intended) #masterychat
Growth. Started doing retakes last year, but not free ones. Require an action plan. Serious Ss follow through, others will try to do better to avoid. Also time for learning varies dramatically. It doesn’t both me if an S takes a second shot, provided they prepared. #MasteryChat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A5: Abso-friggin-lutely!!! If the point of the thing is mastery, kids should be able to retake the assessment until they achieve mastery (after appropriate instruction, of course!). #masterychat
A5 - one hundred percernt. To not allow retakes completely defeats the purpose of mastering content. Obviously guidelines must be given, but retakes is like practicing to make perfection. #masterychat
I think some of the biggest challenges facing common core were its direct link to assessment and the way it was communicated. With common core came new tests (and not necessarily well done tests). There also needed to be MUCH more done to educate the public! #masterychat
A5: Favorite question thus far. Retakes are an extremely valuable tool. Testing is not teaching, but if we can take a testing experience and have students LEARN from it, why not? That would be opportunity wasted. Have them retake on their own time & write explanation #MasteryChat
A5 Retakes are fine. But in some cases retakes include a consequence, depends on what you are doing. #masterychat yes I can retake a test in the real world, but it has consequences. Cost, reduced privileges, loss of income.
A1: The word "lecture" is loaded. But I've seen some great lectures enhanced by creative use of media. Some direct instruction is valuable, saves time, can clarify information and expectations. But the information shared needs to be transferred by students to tasks. #masterychat
Q1 Let's come right out of the gate with a bang! Lecture- for or against? Tell us why!
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Rapid content delivery.
-When done well, can be engaging!
Cons:
-Rarely done well.
-Teacher centered. Little to no opportunities for student engagement.
#masterychat
A5) Part of having a growth mindset is persevering through failure. If we don't allow students opportunity for retakes we are contradicting ourselves. #masterychat
A5 Used to be hardcore against them but have come to realize how awesome they can be when used for actual learning instead of grade-grubbing! I have had so many second chances, why not give them some? #masterychat
#MasteryChat A5 IMO Restests are setting a bad example. Does your doctor get to retest their surgery on you? Does an engineer get to retest when they build a bad bridge? Kids should be taught to DO IT RIGHT THE 1ST TIME!
I feel retakes are encouraging for Ss to know that if they are having a bad day/week/time their grade is not at risk. We all make mistakes. I personally hope that I would be given grace in a situation like this. Yes the world can be a harsh place, but should school?
#masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
The part that I struggle with the most from a political perspective is how funding gets tied to national standards.
I fully support collaboration, but don't tie desperately needed funding to forced compliance. #Masterychat
A5: Teaching is about learning and getting better. These Ss are children, not experts on my content area. They need to make mistakes and see them and then fix them. Why would I care if they can do the work on Tuesday and only Tuesday? #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A5: Retake all day, every day. Who am I to say you MUST learn by Thursday at 1pm or be forever penalized for it?! No scarlet letters here. #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
This is why I think the word "lecture" is loaded. Storytelling is something else entirely, but I think gets grouped up in the lecture category.
And stories are powerful. #masterychat
My best lecture-based teachers were really story tellers. I especially remember a professor of philosophy. Had to take his class my last semester of undergrad. Was not interested in the class at all until he engaged us with his examples and stories. Became a fav class.
A5: absolutely for retakes! Discuss this daily bc I’m one of the few to allow it. Allow for growth. What does it say about that teacher if they leave that student behind and move on. I always ask who really failed? #masterychat
A5 - Retakes...Seriously do we care WHEN they know it or THAT they know it! Every real world “Important” assessment allows this GRE, MCAT, LSAT, SAT, ACT...What argument is there to not allow this?! #masterychat
A5.5
I've seen too many HS students do a "soft try" of a test knowing there was a retake (or multiple retakes) available. Not training a prepared, risk-taking kind of mindset, I think.
#masterychat
If you're not offering re-assessment, a chance for Ss to show that they've learned from mistakes (and earn credit), why wouldn't they quit on you? You've quit on them and their ability to learn what you just assessed! (Shots fired?) #masterychat
A5: My district has had the re-take, re-do policy for about 5 years. I’m in favor for true mastery. My assessments are performance assessments. Ss have to correct, prepare, rehearse, show the skills. Given enough timely feedback, most Ss don’t need re-takes. #MasteryChat
A5b - Retakes are also dependent on the content area. I’m fine subjects, students must be competent in areas before moving on. Also, allowing retakes provides inspiration to students. It shows you want them to succeed. #masterychat
A5-Einstein’s def of insanity is doing the same thing again and expecting a dif result. I figure out a different way to assess and give them as many chances as needed to master the skill. #masterychat
I could not disagree more here. Not all kids are built the same or learn the same way or at the same pace. Kids can learn as much from failing and re-doing (with supports and scaffolds) as they can from getting it right the 1st time. Failure is a learning tool. #masterychat
Ah, I see. I thought you were saying to listen to what they say without giving them a specific prompt to evaluate you and your lecture, more like a casual, "Hey, what did you think of class today?"
#masterychat
A5: I'm a huge fan. It is how the real world works (at least to an extent). Mistakes at work = figure it out, fix it, and put plans in place to not let it happen again. I'm also not sure that it has to decrease responsibility or other less than optimal habits! #masterychat
A5: Not a fan bc it's usually about the grade & not the learning, at least in my HS experience! I offer tutoring for comp. issues or reteaching as needed. I never want a kid to not "get it" but I do want them to engage in learning, study well, ask questions, etc.
#MasteryChat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A5. Retakes, are important for Ss! Mastery learning, not concentrating on grades, but concentrating on Mastery of the standards in learning! #masterychat
A4: I think that national standards are useful as long as their purpose is communicated effectively. My private school does not follow the national standards, but we have still made our own standards because they create consistency among teachers and grade levels. #masterychat
A5: Learning is all about opportunities to try again in order to grow and learn even more. If our assessments are authentic and meaningful, then giving Ss an opportunity to try again gives us an opportunity to get a true picture of what they are learning. #masterychat
A5. Retakes! 🙌 If we are not honoring a student’s willingness to demonstrate growth and improvement, aren’t we limiting their capabilities? #MasteryChat
A5 For retakes m... after the content has been retaught, practiced, and the student understands how and what was missed. I’ve seen loads of retakes given immediately after in hopes that the Ss will at least “guess correctly” this time. #measuretwicecutonce#masterychat
Final thoughts on the final question of the chat before you rush off to watch the recap on Facebook at https://t.co/9cQrzYDYiK
Give me the rundown on tech. :)
#masterychat
Agreed. And what really gummed up the plumbing was the simultaneous rollout of high stakes teacher evaluations. In hindsight, there should have been some spacing to allow folks to catch their breath. #masterychat
A5 Retakes are a second chance...We all desire one, and we all deserve one.
Failures build grit and determination Each time one fails, one learns. #masterychat
A5: In the real world you learn from your failures. We need to encourage risk taking & provide a space where Ss are not failed for failing. Retaking something is fine, but you need to make sure that Ss focus on the process rather than the final product. #masterychat
A5: I like retakes. Denying a student grace only hurts their confidence and their relationship with you. However, giving them a million second chances only hurts their work ethic and real world expectations #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A4-I don’t mind natl standards-in FL we get a lot of kids who’ve moved from other states. Finding a common starting place can be tricky. But asking k ss to write equations is crazy! We need to “keep up” globally too, but I worry that it pushes too hard too early #masterychat
A5. If "B" depends on the students learning "A", why go on until they know "A". They will get discouraged, behind, and never catch up. (this is me in middle school math)
#masterychat
A5. It depends on your perspective. If you are an educator & you teach so that your Ss master a concept then retakes are fine. They can use the mastered concepts in “the real world” I teach until kids get it! #masterychat
This #MasteryChat has me like....
OOOOH YES! and OH NOOOO!
I can't handle the conflicting opinions this close to bed time. Gotta love that the conversations keep going - all for the love of our students' futures!
Agreed. Someone mentioned if we listen to TEDtalks then how could we be against lecture, but when I think back to my favorite TEDtalks, I'd consider them as stories by storytellers. #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
A5: Totally support retakes to promote growth!! However, coming up to me the day before the marking period ends in March and asking to redo an assignment from January.... not so much. I do not support averaging of scores. If your retake is higher, that is your gr! #masterychat
I agree on this too. I am in elementary so retakes for everyone (within reason). I realize the world can be a harsh place, wouldn't it be nice if school wasn't?
Then again I do not have to grade 80 essays...
#masterychat
A5) Absolutely retakes! If I am interested in getting a student2 mastery, why would I stop below that just b/c he/she didn't reach mastery in the time I expected? Isn't that a little unfair? It's not a retake; it's giving Ss proper time2 reach the learning objective. #masterychat
A2: I can capture these pros using alternative assessment. The only value a standardized test brings in my opinion is a benchmark to compare all students similarly by-- but that's also one of the biggest cons. (1 of 2) #masterychat
Q2 Ah, the infamous testing question! What are you thoughts on standardized testing?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Lots of data to use!
-Opportunity to reflect as teachers
Cons:
-Stressful
-Expensive
-Questionable effectiveness and reliability
#Masterychat
A2, part 2 I think shorter, more meaningful assessments--sometimes including tests--are indispensable. But stakes matter. And if they're constructed well and critically, you can compare the data meaningfully anyway.
I say "no" to standardized tests, no hesitation. #masterychat
#masterychat@TechieTeachOtt
I need to bolt/get to work but this has been amazing again to talk and collab w some thoughtful educators. Please reach out to https://t.co/KnLrKZDdhM if we can help you or your school level up impact projects around #Empathy#SDGs#PBL We're here.
A5: Depends on the situation. We teach children and sometimes it matters to be aware of the circumstances around the failure. Will they grow and learn from it? #MasteryChat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
Key words: After appropriate instruction. I think reteaching is essential before they retake. Also, asking them to reflect on their mistakes, so they are actually learning opportunities #MasteryChat
A5: Abso-friggin-lutely!!! If the point of the thing is mastery, kids should be able to retake the assessment until they achieve mastery (after appropriate instruction, of course!). #masterychat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
#MasteryChat A5 IMO Restests are setting a bad example. Does your doctor get to retest their surgery on you? Does an engineer get to retest when they build a bad bridge? Kids should be taught to DO IT RIGHT THE 1ST TIME!
A6: I love technology! This is a tech driven world and only gets more so every day. The opportunities are nearly endless to incorporate technology. It’s fun and innovative! #masterychat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
A5: In the real world you learn from your failures. We need to encourage risk taking & provide a space where Ss are not failed for failing. Retaking something is fine, but you need to make sure that Ss focus on the process rather than the final product. #masterychat
A3 Homework is a necessity for collegiate high school classes to complete content, as in college, but for younger students it's an unnecessary burden. We can do so much more with tech in class now that it's a waste of time an energy to assign it. #masterychat
A5.2 when looking at retakes your goal as an educator is to get students to understand the content, learn to fail and recover, if you are worried about them learning responsibility it can still be taught by maybe having them retake during and important time to them. #masterychat
Great question! I teach 8th grade, and I want my students to master writing the basics of a historical argument, learn to read primary/secondary sources, have open ended classroom discussions, and consider multiple perspectives when learning content. #MasteryChat
Any thoughts for how you could both offer a retake AND teach the life skill of not taking the "soft try" approach? I am mostly in the retake camp, but I also see the challenges associated with it. #masterychat
A6: Standards need to be mastered by the end of the school year. Students should be able to retake assessments until they master the standard. I am so glad that we have switched to standards based report cards just because of this! #MasteryChat
Do you think they don’t now? My daughter practiced and practiced and studied and studied. So she should be penalized forever if she flubs it?! #masterychat
A6 - When used effectively Tech can be an amazing tool. When used as a replacement for a textbook it can be harmful. It’s not about the technology itself but ONLY the context and quality of its implementation! #masterychat
A6: Technology is a great tool, but as better as it's getting by the minute, it will never replace a great teacher. Let’s not delude ourselves into thinking so. #masterychat
No problem. It's 3:50am here, so might not respond again until later today😁👍🏼
It really depends on the age of the student. I'm talking really short mini-bursts of teacher-talk.. 1-3 mins at the younger phases, to explicitly teach some contextulised vocabulary 1/n #MasteryChat
In reply to
@Stella_Pollard, @AlbaMcCance, @effortfuleduktr, @TechieTeachOtt, @olicav, @pimpmymemory, @AceThatTest
Q3: Homework is like schoolwork- assigned thoughtfully, it can be beneficial. If reduced to busywork, it’s an utter waste of time. Less is more. Know your students’ needs. Choose tasks with intent. #homework#Masterychat
A6. Tech is a tool, just like a pencil, eraser, or glue. Some kids will still stick the pencil up their nose or eat the glue stick. But guess what, most of the kids if given the proper guidance, can create some beautiful things (tangible or digital) with tech #MasteryChat
A6: I’m a tech fan. Our school is 1:1. Every kid on a laptop. Every kid being able to practice typing, using documents, being able to translate texts into their own languages, listening to texts, googling things I don’t know...and more! #Masterychat
A6: I LOVE #edtech in the classroom! BUT it has to be done right and not JUST to SAY you are integrating technology. Ss need to be engaged, know how to manipulate it and not be distracted by it. It should ENHANCE thier learning! #masterychat
A6) It's not necessarily the frequent use, but how it's being used. If we r only using tech for the sake of using it, then that's pretty pointless. But if somehow it enhances the teaching, learning, or creation, then that's a plus. #masterychat
A5: Feedback is CRUCIAL to the learning process. Retakes engage students in feedback and drive improvement.
How likely is a S going to read and consider fb if they don't get a retake vs if they do get a retake? #MasteryChat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
I wonder how many times the doctor had to practice, test, and perhaps retest before earning the license. And the engineer. Thank goodness they took chances, found out what DIDN'T work before opening my head or ruining my commute! #masterychat
What kinds of recommendations would you offer for these mini lectures at the elementary level? A general guide line for length or style?
I use my own version of mini-lectures in my class, but it is a term that can mean different things to different people. #masterychat
In reply to
@SuperbSchools, @effortfuleduktr, @AlbaMcCance
#MasteryChat A6 Technology SHOULD BE A TOOL used to teach. In TX there are TECHNOLOGY TEKS you need to be aware of that you should incorporate into your lessons.
A6: Again, it's all about the how. And the why. If using a particular tech tool, are we using it purposefully? And sometimes engagement CAN be a purpose! #masterychat
A6 - Using technology for technology's sake is my worry over frequency. My school is doing a big tech push and I keep saying to teachers and students, "Find a method and product that works for you" Then use the tech to help focus attention. #masterychat
#masterychat a4 Personally I am super glad that we have AusVELS in Victoria, Australia, as #languages are standardised across state. Testing culture is govt driven. Years 7 to 10 it's not a problem for me at all.
It’s interesting - conversion I mean. Parents buy in when explained well. Ss buy in when they see how it works. They are the ones who really convince the parents. #MasteryChat#sblchat
In reply to
@PegMuehlenkamp, @myrondueck, @LarsonGarth, @rickwormeli2
I love the idea of using @screencastify to record the videos so students can listen on a speed that's comfortable for them but also a time that's convenient. #masterychat
In reply to
@SuperbSchools, @AlbaMcCance, @effortfuleduktr, @TechieTeachOtt, @olicav, @pimpmymemory, @AceThatTest, @Screencastify
A6: Tech has many uses, but it also has many distractions. Love computers in my classroom, hate phones! Many lessons can't compete w/ SnapChat streaks, Twitter beefs, Netflix, etc. 🤷🤦 #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
A6 I think there’s a place for technology as long as it’s not just putting a worksheet on a screen. I think it’s needed because that’s life now....technology is part of it...so needs to be incorporate but also the ability to be independent of it. #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
A5-retakes/redo/fix what you missed-in elem...yes! Their lil’ brains have too much going at warp speed during a unit test. Work thru it-calm down-work some more #masterychat
A6 - Tech is a great way to explore learning. But as with all other areas of instruction, the teacher designs and implements lessons that make tech useful and empowering. Blending tech with other styles is key. #masterychat
BONUS QUESTION: Have you shifted your thinking on any topics tonight or had a particularly engaging conversation? Tell us about it and tag the person that made that happen!
#masterychat
If you're not in favor of re-assessment....how do you advise your administrator handle you and your contract if your Ss fail to learn something the first time? Hmmmmm........ #masterychat
A6: Tech in the classroom deserves a space. But if we value authentic literacy we cannot allow screens to replace books.
(I’m old-school like that.) #MasteryChat
A6: Love this quote "Technology is all too often applied as an add-on to existing curriculum. Educators must weave it into the curriculum in such a way that the tool matches the desired learning outcome." #masterychat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
Although I'm in the minority in the chat tonight, I genuinely appreciate the opportunity to talk about these issues...so many other edchats avoid them. #MasteryChat
A6: Technology is a must!! We need to teach our Ss how to use it in a purposeful way. If they are not being taught that at school where will they learn etiquette? Everyone should read SocialLeading by @JCasaTodd#MasteryChat
A6. If tech is ENHANCING student learning, great, use it all day. For the most part, that is our Ss reality. Shouldn’t be a replacement for worksheets.... #MasteryChat
A6 - Technology is such a crazy broad term. I use music/videos daily to teach Spanish, but that to me doesn't seem much like technology nowadays. Maybe when I was beginning my career, but now "tech" is just standard and has simply blended into our methodology. #MasteryChat
I’m pro technology. Love it for formative assessment, research, and collaboration. Have to ask tho whether tech is doing the exact same thing that a paper and pencil can be doing? #masterychat
So if they show the skill, but still have an F, how does that benefit, esp at high school level when stress of college is looming? #masterychat (truly curious, not snarky)
A6 I'm piloting 1:1 in my classes this year...so yeah! Great opportunity to build necessary skills and personalize learning. It's a tool, not the end-goal. If Ss have access and schools put time into helping everyone properly use it, let's do it! #masterychat
A6: we are 1:1 in our district and I utilize the benefits of the technology with collaborative tools like Google classroom and @flipgrid for empowering #studentvoice we still use pencil and paper. I allow student choice in presentation of knowledge #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
A6: Frequent use of technology is bad when it is used for everything. Kids need to manipulate objects in math. They need to do science experiments. They need to TALK to each other!! #masterychat
A6: Technology should be a microphone, a publisher, a canvas - anything that helps Ss communicate and produce.
If not, put it away. Tech isn't the only tool, just the most recent one.
#MasteryChat
A6. Technology is always good. Ss love technology and using it. Learn with Ss! If we take risks, and model, they will be encouraged to take risks. #masterychat
I think tech should be in every class but with specific purpose and intent. We NEED to educate Ss on how to successfully use tech to learn and grow since our our world is so tech heavy/dependent. If we do not teach them appropriate usage, who will?
#masterychat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
We need to embrace these differences of opinion. They are real and reflect our diverse u. I love how supportive #edutwitter can be but also appreciate a healthy, respectful level of debate and discourse. #masterychat
The older the students are, the more you can of course keep their attention and delve deeper into abstract concepts.
It is an artform in many ways, but you can use research to frame things... to be more effective.
Eg. Bringing Words to Life by Beck et al 😁👍🏼#MasteryChat
In reply to
@Stella_Pollard, @AlbaMcCance, @effortfuleduktr, @TechieTeachOtt, @olicav, @pimpmymemory, @AceThatTest
A5, part 1: If we want to assess learning meaningfully, then we need to recognize and account for the fact that learning is a process. And if learning is a process, we need to allow for that process to happen, and happen differently for different students. #masterychat
Q5 Retakes! Honoring growth or a time-wasting crutch for Ss?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Shows students the value of perseverance
-Encourages self-efficacy &responsibility
Cons:
-DECREASES responsibility
-Can bog down Ts
-Encourages procrastination & being ill-prepared
#MasteryChat
A5, part 2: There's a great read on how to make students accountable for retests & retakes by @betamiller. I've shared this with teachers on multiple occasions: https://t.co/3MSSkWCqVK#masterychat
A6: It depends on how the teacher is using it. Are students thinking critically? Are they creating? Are the communicating and collaborating? If so- I think tech is allowing us to do awesome things. If they're individually working everyday- not so much. #masterychat
You are all awesome! Thank you for your open minds, thoughtful responses, and civil, respectful conversation!
Come join me in the Teach Better Team facebook group to participate in a live recap of tonight's chat! https://t.co/M0MDNZeSV5#masterychat
A6- at the HS, cell phones and time spent on social media can be a distraction to learning- I suspect I have some kids with addiction issues. #MasteryChat
A6) Tech! Tech! Intentional and innovative use of tech! Not as a substitution, but to modify and redefine learning. Ss are tech savvy as toddlers. Tech is a tool, not the lesson! Use tech to increase rigor and relevance in learning. #SAMR#MasteryChat#techandlearningcoach
A6: In moderation. It's a great tool to aid in the learning process. At the end of the day though, human interaction is fundamental.
Technology can't replace certain things and we shouldn't try to force it. #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
#MasteryChat More than once I have had a St hand an uncompleted test to me and asked for a retest. Kids are being taught that this is ok. DO IT RIGHT THE 1ST TIME! I do believe in retests, but it is being over abused. How many college students get to retake their final exam?
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
Conversations with you have been a driving force in choosing this topic for our chat.
Professional disagreement is not only valuable, it is critical.
Thank you for being a part of it.
#masterychat
A6 I love using technology to enhance our class, giving them opportunities to show off their skills or try new things. I don't like when it's just for busy work, "play" time only, or in place of paper because where's the discovery, creativity, voice? #masterychat
Tech with a purpose can be great like using VR headsets to travel into the body or walk through a foreign country. Too much tech causes Ss to lose person to person interactions. #MasteryChat
Q6 Frequent use of technology in the classroom. Does it help or harm?
Some thoughts:
Pros:
-Active student participation
-Easy formative assessment and data analysis
-Tech is a life skill
Cons:
-Distraction to learning
-Technical issues
-Inequality access
#MasteryChat
Q3: I know many schools have abandoned homework. My question is what replaces it. Do those students fit a certain demographic? Are there extra-curricular activities they attend instead? Do families have more quality time together as a result? Does this work for all? #MasteryChat
A6 - Our tech use as teachers can confuse our Ss' parents, I've recently discovered. Some are utterly blown away by lack of textbooks and have NO clue what their kids are learning. Tech might be easy to use for us, but do we help parents use it at home? #MasteryChat
I think it's really dependent on you to hold Ss accountable for participating in their learning instead of letting them move forward after bombing a discussion or flunking a quiz. If we demand reflection and respect for the process, I think kids will step up! #masterychat
Definitely, Sella! @seesaw is a great app for many reasons too. Using @Flipgrid or simply popping up videos on @YouTube (never had the confidence to do that yet) can help other students, not just your class or cohort.
#MasteryChat#SuperbSchools#PrimaryRocks
In reply to
@Stella_Pollard, @AlbaMcCance, @effortfuleduktr, @TechieTeachOtt, @olicav, @pimpmymemory, @AceThatTest, @Screencastify, @Seesaw, @Flipgrid, @YouTube
A6: Technology is only as useful as the meaning behind its use. You don't use it just for the sake of using it. You use it when it will empower students to use thinking, communication, self-management, and/or reflection skills—just as with all the tools we may use. #masterychat
Great questions! I see Mastery as something that transcends a single event. Rather than a specific percentage, it is an evidence-based conclusion. #Masterychat
