#ASEchat Archive

The Association for Science Education (ASE) promotes excellence in science teaching and learning. Follow #ASEchat Mondays at 3pm ET.

Monday February 19, 2018
3:00 PM EST

  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:03 PM EST
    @sciencealidaly happy to help if you need a few resources to get the discussions going #ASEchat
    In reply to @sciencealldaly, @RobynShadbolt
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:04 PM EST
    We are HoD Science and Maths looking for joint approach. Resources appreciated #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @RobynShadbolt
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:04 PM EST
    Expertise and resources ;) #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @RobynShadbolt
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:06 PM EST
    since LoMiS was published Richard has gone on to produce some handy discussion activities that can be found at https://t.co/v2ZcmhnL2L #ASEchat
    In reply to @sciencealldaly, @RobynShadbolt
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:07 PM EST
    No #asechat tonight?
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:08 PM EST
    Suggest you provide your colleagues with a table of data and ask them to draw a line graph using the data. See if you can spot any similarities in approach! #ASEchat
    In reply to @RobynShadbolt, @sciencealldaly
  • _theteachr Feb 19 @ 3:08 PM EST
    Is there a chat tonight? #ASEchat
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:08 PM EST
    #asechat I voted for one
    In reply to @MarcNeesam
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:08 PM EST
    The result of the #asechat poll looks to be School science V real science Similarities and differences?
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:09 PM EST
    There was a poll and the top response was 'what is the difference between school science and real science?' No one has followed up with a comment yet, but we are waiting! #ASEchat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:09 PM EST
    Most school science seems to be cut and dried, whereas real science is built on uncertainty do you agree? #asechat
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:10 PM EST
    What did you vote for Steve, if you do not mind me asking? I found the poll too challenging #ASEchat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @MarcNeesam
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:10 PM EST
    #asechat guess they both focus on 'tests'!
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:10 PM EST
    Or is it just the way we tell it? School sci V real sci #asechat
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:10 PM EST
    Bringing 'real' science into the classroom great way to engage students #asechat
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:11 PM EST
    Interested in this since attending the @royalsociety Education event. Made me wonder if School Science and cutting edge science can be easy bedfellows. #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:11 PM EST
    Not sure the science we 'sell' in school is really that cur t and dried, but it makes our lives easier if we present it that way - eg - 'there are three states of matter' #ASEchat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:11 PM EST
    Its certainly the way to show that there’s still things to find out, and its done by real people just like them #asechat
  • LessonToolbox Feb 19 @ 3:12 PM EST
    Y13 anatomy class create their own skeletal socks via @RJGrimshaw86 #asechat #biology #ukedchat #aussieEd
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:12 PM EST
    The best I can hope for is that 'real science' can provide some exciting contexts in which to teach the school stuff #ASEchat
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:12 PM EST
    Yes, in school Science you have to get the answer ‘right’, but in real science you spend much of your time being wrong, or at least not as right as you’d ideally like. #asechat
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:13 PM EST
    Children say, ‘that didn’t work’ not mmm I wonder whats going on here? school science can smother curiosity #asechat
  • _theteachr Feb 19 @ 3:13 PM EST
    There is a difference between real science and school science... maybe necessarily so... do we have to learn the basics before we get into the real stuff #ASEchat
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:14 PM EST
    #asechat not a question of exciting but real, relevant, applicable, meaningful
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:14 PM EST
    School science is by its nature artificial - trying to distill hundreds of years of discovery into small chunks and giving pupils a ‘method’ that is loosely based on something that had a lot of trial and error in it. Little room for failure in school science as well? #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:14 PM EST
    For this #asechat I think we mean any science that goes on outside of school ;)
    • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:13 PM EST
      What are we calling 'real' science? cutting edge research, or science in action?
      In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:15 PM EST
    I think biology has a head start here, particularly human health and disease where so much cutting edge seems to fit with the curriculum #ASEchat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:15 PM EST
    Can you say a bit more about this @hrogerson #asechat
    • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:11 PM EST
      Interested in this since attending the @royalsociety Education event. Made me wonder if School Science and cutting edge science can be easy bedfellows. #asechat
      In reply to @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:15 PM EST
    #ASEchat oh dear out of practice
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:16 PM EST
    It would be disruptive to our assessment system if credit was given for relativist positions and imaginative answers (?) #ASEChat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam
  • dizzyfizzicist Feb 19 @ 3:16 PM EST
    And space #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:16 PM EST
    #ASEchat!
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:17 PM EST
    Hi Margaret! Good to hear from you! #ASEchat
    In reply to @margaretflem, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:17 PM EST
    'real' science needed to bridge the 'sir, when will we ever need to know this?' bridge #asechat
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    Does 'MRS GREN' count as school science? #ASEchat
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    Ah ! #asechat school science is about assessment and real science is life!?
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    But you’ve given them the opportunity to think how science really works! #asechat
    • dizzyfizzicist Feb 19 @ 3:15 PM EST
      I try to give my classes a “wrong” hypothesis early in the year. They usually assume they have done something wrong though
      In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • _theteachr Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    Sometimes real science is endless hours of tedious work before something special emerges... #ASEchat
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    #ASEchat very kind lots of #fatfingers atm
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:18 PM EST
    A bit like the lesson when teaching children to light a Bunsen Burner then? #ASEChat
    In reply to @sciencealldaly
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:19 PM EST
    Close! #ASEChat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @MarcNeesam
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:19 PM EST
    What about trying mystery boxes @sciencemuseum https://t.co/a8OjCTv3rm #asechat to emphasise what science is really like
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:19 PM EST
    We looked at some of the science that is on the Royal Society’s agenda like machine Learning and ocean floor resources. Can we teach about these in the current curriculum? #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
    So what about teaching children to deal with problems through practical science where they can learn from mistakes - I would give credit for that #ASEchat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @MarcNeesam
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
    Is it contagious? #ASEchat
    In reply to @margaretflem, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
    If disruptive = make life difficult then yes 😉 #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
    Evening all, just trying to work out what the #ASEChat question means
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
    #ASEchat https://t.co/02ogH2z8XH
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:21 PM EST
    Why not? #asechat *ducks*
    • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:19 PM EST
      We looked at some of the science that is on the Royal Society’s agenda like machine Learning and ocean floor resources. Can we teach about these in the current curriculum? #asechat
      In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    #ASEchat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • _theteachr Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    ‘Force is that which tends to change the state of rest or uniform motion of an object in a straight line’ (Abbot, 19-something) Didn’t realise for years what I had learned by heart at high school. #ASEchat
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    What do we mean by real science cf school science #asechat?
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    It surely is an exemplar of what the essence of school science is? #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    I do not mean by real science that we should be setting children tasks that are a waste of time, but allowing them opportunities to investigate for themselves #EPQ #ASEChat
    In reply to @_theteachr
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
    How much does what we teach in school science truly reflect real science? #asechat (I think)
    • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:20 PM EST
      Evening all, just trying to work out what the #ASEChat question means
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:23 PM EST
    #ASEchat indeed
    In reply to @sciencealldaly
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:23 PM EST
    Main barrier these days is the shear volume of the curriculum, meaning there isn’t much time to deviate from it. #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:24 PM EST
    An exemplar that shows how we package things to teach them before children understand the component parts, so they can parrot the 'right answer' ?? #tryingtogetarise #ASEChat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:24 PM EST
    Don't forget #asechat @PhysicsPundit
    • PhysicsPundit Feb 19 @ 3:22 PM EST
      It's all about context. Getting students to get decent science grades is only one small part, we need them to then go onto amazing STEM careers.
      In reply to @sciencealldaly
  • ChristinaAstin Feb 19 @ 3:24 PM EST
    The @RISchools idea is great for this - researchers teach 4 days pw and can continue their research - as long as they share it with their classes. #ASEchat
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:25 PM EST
    I think it is important to reflect what science is - that is helping them understand that scientists are seeking to explain the physical world around us #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:25 PM EST
    So school science includes collecting and analysing data, and deciding what it means. Thinking about errors and working out how to improve, this feels like real science #asechat what else?
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:25 PM EST
    This links to when to reform curriculum. It has been suggested every 10 years or so a large revision is needed as that is the time scale of large knowledge shifts and updating too often to account for ‘new’ knowledge may not reflect what is valuable in the long term #asechat
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:25 PM EST
    Have you got a link to the recipe for making mystery boxes or is it in the clip? #ASEchat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • DrDav Feb 19 @ 3:26 PM EST
    My understanding was that it is more likely to be education research rather than their scientific research. #asechat
    In reply to @ChristinaAstin
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:26 PM EST
    NQT did great work with this last year. directed at higher ability students #asechat
    In reply to @ChristinaAstin, @RISchools
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:26 PM EST
    Can we teach about real science in the curriculum? I do explain to students sometimes the conditions Newton did his light experiments in. #asechat
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    Perhaps not at moment - not because curriculum is overstuffed, but because assessment has become too high stakes people are afraid to wander from the spec #ASEChat
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    #asechat mystery boxes or tubes, latter in recent SSR article I am told
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • ChristinaAstin Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    Sharing ideas about to make science real is the only way unless you use Salters @UYSEG #ASEchat
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    Yes, agree with the high stakes of assessment. #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    Isn't Working Scientifically part of the curriculum? #asechat
    In reply to @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
    Can it be done at KS2 and KS3 so they really get what science is? That way they can be enthused by the ‘specification’ ?? #asechat
    • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:23 PM EST
      Main barrier these days is the shear volume of the curriculum, meaning there isn’t much time to deviate from it. #asechat
      In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:28 PM EST
    Hope not #ASEchat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56, @royalsociety
  • ChristinaAstin Feb 19 @ 3:29 PM EST
    Not at all - I did a training session for 33 physics PhDs in Aug & they were all science post-docs #asechat
    In reply to @DrDav
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:29 PM EST
    But assessment should reflect Working scientifically, which should be about how science works :) #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • DrDav Feb 19 @ 3:29 PM EST
    Really good enquiry work done in some primary schools - but ignored when pupils get into secondary. #asechat
    • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
      Can it be done at KS2 and KS3 so they really get what science is? That way they can be enthused by the ‘specification’ ?? #asechat
      • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:23 PM EST
        Main barrier these days is the shear volume of the curriculum, meaning there isn’t much time to deviate from it. #asechat
        In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:29 PM EST
    Thanks Steve - must look this up as I do not recollect seeing it in SSR #ASEChat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:30 PM EST
    Yes! (The human stories around the curriculum are great). #asechat
    In reply to @myorangecrush
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:30 PM EST
    #asechat by kendrick
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:30 PM EST
    yes by our very own @HelpfulScience Its in https://t.co/FClR48oHDD edition of SSR, in fact quite a lot relevant to this twitter discussion #asechat
    • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:27 PM EST
      #asechat mystery boxes or tubes, latter in recent SSR article I am told
      In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • PhysicsPundit Feb 19 @ 3:31 PM EST
    Can we afford not to teach 'real' science in schools? If we only produce assessment trained robots, where is the love and excitement of science going to come from for the next generation? #stuffyourassessments #ASEChat
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:31 PM EST
    A small task for you Marc - in the last 20 years what science has been removed from the GCSE curriculum because it is outdated, to make space for new science? #ASEChat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:32 PM EST
    The limestone cycle #asechat *yawn*
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:32 PM EST
    #ASEchat Yes read this very interesting way of looking at modelling
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:33 PM EST
    So why are we not teaching them about coral bleaching, ocean acidification etc? It could be relevant and it is real cutting edge science #ASEChat
    In reply to @hrogerson
  • hrogerson Feb 19 @ 3:33 PM EST
    We’ll see . I thought that in 2006 and I was wrong, facts not ideas or understanding was the way to go. 😣 #ASEchat
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56
  • stuartteachphys Feb 19 @ 3:33 PM EST
    Was once told that a science PhD is six month's work that takes 3 years to do. The progress culture in schools works against it, but also- how many young people would be turned on to science by that? (Though I'd love to try citizen science projects with right people) #ASEChat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @_theteachr
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:34 PM EST
    I quite liked the limestone cycle - the science was valuable what often let it down was the teaching #closetgeologist #asechat
    In reply to @sciencealldaly, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:34 PM EST
    Yes! #asechat I think IOP open doors project pointed to how this makes science gender neutral?
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @NeedhamL56
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:34 PM EST
    #ASEchat because we do not want to assess it?
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson
  • ChristinaAstin Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    #ASEchat - there will be loads of ideas here to bring science teaching alive! Just 25 places left now for those of you able to get to Canterbury on a Saturday...
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    I agree although attempts to teach WS have not been a great success - (taught by osmosis?) and not easy to assess either it appears #ASEChat
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    The clip explains, you can buy the boxes, or make your own, but best if you get someone else to do it, so you REALLY don’t know whats in them @Bio_Joe had a go at using them #asechat
    • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:25 PM EST
      Have you got a link to the recipe for making mystery boxes or is it in the clip? #ASEchat
      In reply to @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    Teachers still have that flexibility at a school curriculum level. The national is the starting point not a limitation #asechat
    In reply to @ejsearle, @sciencealldaly, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • Rendcombbiology Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    Help! In curriculum model discussions, a proposal for 55min lessons no doubles at all has been put forward. Has anyone run a level bio pracs in this time? #asechat
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
    Context remains numbingly dull #asechat
    In reply to @ejsearle, @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:36 PM EST
    #ASEchat this https://t.co/zziIuQYJKt
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @NeedhamL56
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
    Technically nothing in the curriculum should become outdated if you build one centred around conceptual development. However if lots of contexts or specifics are added then they will need changing or if there is a fundamental shift in subject understanding #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • PhysicsPundit Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
    For anyone wondering, my definition of 'real' science is to take students that are learning about forces to see and measure a crash test. Or getting the Y7s into a national competition to build rocket cars etc etc. Make science real, bring it out of the dusty textbooks! #ASEchat
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
    #asechat
    • myorangecrush Feb 19 @ 3:33 PM EST
      And James Watson. Also vile. I have a soft spot for Le Chatelier and Oliver Lodge (should have been one of the UKs great physicists but spent his career mostly looking for ghosts).
      In reply to @hrogerson
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
    #asechat
    • Physicsgeek2411 Feb 19 @ 3:33 PM EST
      Recently the best lesson I taught was about density and Archimedes. Following that a lesson about Tesla and how Edison wasn’t really the person behind the 💡!
      In reply to @hrogerson, @myorangecrush
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:38 PM EST
    I hope that most exam questions will be application of ideas in new contexts and therefore teachers who have used lots of contexts to show how scientists work will have given their students a good flavour of science AND prepared them well for the exam. #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:38 PM EST
    There is a danger perhaps that the assessment system may not be able to keep pace with the growth in scientific knowledge, so focus on historical rather than cutting edge? #ASEchat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:38 PM EST
    Nice work! @Ange_K1 I was trying to remember who else had tried using them #asechat #mysteryboxes
    • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
      My tech made me a set after we first saw them at #aseconf. I’ve no idea what’s in the, still, but I’ve used them in some great discussions with kids.
      In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:39 PM EST
    #asechat no, school's have the flexibility/ expectation to create a school curriculum with National as minimum, only if not academy or free others do just a school curriculum!
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @ejsearle, @sciencealldaly, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:39 PM EST
    Yes, I agree with you. Although sometimes the conceptual development gets a bit lost in the list of things to learn. #ASEchat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:39 PM EST
    That would be a very small task! new material added but little taken away. (Possibly mostly added in biology?) #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:40 PM EST
    Not if you are an Architect :) #asechat
    • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:35 PM EST
      Context remains numbingly dull #asechat
      In reply to @ejsearle, @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:40 PM EST
    Brilliant - every home should have one (a set of mystery boxes) We have similar but they are bottles of cleaning fluids - guess what each is for #ASEChat
    In reply to @Ange_K1, @NeedhamL56, @sciencemuseum
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:41 PM EST
    But if you want to add new science content (not contexts) - e.g. genomics, what are you going to lose/reduce? #ASEChat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:41 PM EST
    The concern for assessment is consistency in the use of a context in schools so if introduced in an assessment the context doesn’t derail the students and affect question outcomes/statistics. So they stick to safer ground #ASEchat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:41 PM EST
    #ASEchat surely most people over last 25 years since first created
    In reply to @NeedhamL56, @Ange_K1
  • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:42 PM EST
    The bio required prac of pH and amylase caught my class out. There was no way pH9 was ever going to change the iodine from blue-black but they thought it hadn’t worked #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:42 PM EST
    Lost some plant science unfortunately, or moved some difficult ideas into primary to make up for 'physics transfer'???? #ASEchat
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:43 PM EST
    This then comes to how the curriculum is presented and how progress in understanding is developed over time in the curriculum. Effectively good curriculum design at the start. A curriculum built as a collection of important but uncohesive statements will have issues #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:44 PM EST
    I understand the issues but I remain concerned about how examination performance has become the main driver rather than a solid science education #ASEchat
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson
  • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:44 PM EST
    Post it note for size #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:44 PM EST
    #ASEChat
    • myorangecrush Feb 19 @ 3:42 PM EST
      These tend to be my ‘filler’ lessons at the end of terms. A lesson I sell on TES about bees is my best seller.
      In reply to @ViciaScience, @hrogerson
  • myorangecrush Feb 19 @ 3:45 PM EST
    Sorry. I’m rubbish at remembering the #ASEChat bit. 😌
    In reply to @ViciaScience
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:45 PM EST
    AARGH! BUT what a great opportunity to say.. but it has worked… these are your results... now explain it #asechat
    • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:42 PM EST
      The bio required prac of pH and amylase caught my class out. There was no way pH9 was ever going to change the iodine from blue-black but they thought it hadn’t worked #asechat
      In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:45 PM EST
    That then comes to decisions when writing the curriculum about what is held as important. E.g the NGSS in America has a lot about forces and energy early on compared to England and a lot about modelling. #asechat
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:46 PM EST
    home made Mystery boxes #asechat
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:47 PM EST
    #ASEchat early when children are experiencing and questioning and trying to understand those bits of life
    In reply to @MarcNeesam, @MaryUYSEG, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:48 PM EST
    As you might expect, my response to that is to improve the assessment so that it drives the behaviours we want. #asechat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:49 PM EST
    If it is important then build the curriculum around it - there are not that many big ideas in biology! It would make more sense than dividing the curriculum up into types of organisms #ASEchat
    In reply to @MaryUYSEG, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:50 PM EST
    This is school science blurring the edges with real science :) #asechat
    • PhysicsPundit Feb 19 @ 3:37 PM EST
      For anyone wondering, my definition of 'real' science is to take students that are learning about forces to see and measure a crash test. Or getting the Y7s into a national competition to build rocket cars etc etc. Make science real, bring it out of the dusty textbooks! #ASEchat
  • sciencealldaly Feb 19 @ 3:50 PM EST
    Thanks for the #asechat tonight all. Have to be going. See you all next week.
  • MarcNeesam Feb 19 @ 3:51 PM EST
    The point is the choice of doing that isn’t wrong or right as it was a choice made in the context of their audience the curriculum was designed for. There is no one right way to make a science curriculum. More a range of ways depending on the context #asechat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @MaryUYSEG, @ViciaScience, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:51 PM EST
    Yes agree #ASEchat ppl hoping you can all help explore some real ‘Urban science’ issues by completing our survey. https://t.co/7jf2Y6aXMm We can reward you all with writing workshops!!
    • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:44 PM EST
      I understand the issues but I remain concerned about how examination performance has become the main driver rather than a solid science education #ASEchat
      In reply to @MarcNeesam, @stevethedoc1, @hrogerson
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:51 PM EST
    So how many schools use STEM (science) ambassadors to inject realism into science teaching? #ASEchat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:52 PM EST
    #asechat how can we teach one science in school when real is different or at best blurred?
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:53 PM EST
    Thanks for joining in and a few other new ones @myorangecrush & @Physicsgeek2411 & @ejsearle @PhysicsPundit see you next week #asechat
  • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:53 PM EST
    Indeed, and that’s where I went with it (via loads of questioning and getting them to draw diagrams of the enzyme)Think we are so used to using iodine to show it detecting starch that using it to show it changing to sugar confuses them. #asechat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:54 PM EST
    #asechat which ambassadors? School pupils who bring school science OR scientists who bring in their Real science?
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:54 PM EST
    What do we mean by curriculum? Marc referred to this earlier - there is a national Curriculum, but that should not be the only thing guiding the school curriculum. #ASEChat 1/2
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • Ange_K1 Feb 19 @ 3:54 PM EST
    Ooo, we’re doing the rocket cars too! #ASEChat
    In reply to @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:54 PM EST
    I find it challenging to teach 'uncertainty' when social expectations are that scientists will have all of the answers #ASEChat #SISCON was good - science in social context
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56
  • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:55 PM EST
    We have come to a situation where the exam specification is treated as though it is the curriculum, and ABs have responded by writing something that tries to be a scheme of work, but it shouldn't be. 2/2 #ASEChat
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • stuartteachphys Feb 19 @ 3:55 PM EST
    And this is as good as anything on the fun of real science. #asechat
    • David_Bressan Feb 18 @ 5:19 AM EST
      "But Geology ⚒ carries the day: it is like the pleasure of gambling, speculating, on first arriving, what the rocks may be;" Darwin #OTD in 1859, Charles Darwin is awarded the Wollaston Medal by the Geological Society of London for his geo-contributions https://t.co/4QNHgyJ1dB
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:56 PM EST
    It would not be my first choice as a good example for teaching enzyme kinetics. Tradition seems to dictate the curriculum at times #ASEchat
    In reply to @Ange_K1, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:56 PM EST
    Great tweet @MaryUYSEG when I talk to ABs about this they say this is what teachers ask for, not more space, but everything pinned down #creativity lost #asechat
    • MaryUYSEG Feb 19 @ 3:55 PM EST
      We have come to a situation where the exam specification is treated as though it is the curriculum, and ABs have responded by writing something that tries to be a scheme of work, but it shouldn't be. 2/2 #ASEChat
      In reply to @ViciaScience, @MarcNeesam, @hrogerson, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:56 PM EST
    #ASEchat I still have the books!
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:57 PM EST
    Now that would be good education if school science ambassadors could run a session in a research lab! #ASEchat
    In reply to @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56
  • stormeducation Feb 19 @ 3:57 PM EST
    #asechat @MaryUYSEG we have to look at the four National Curricular (Curriculums? it's late lol) plus those of Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and the #ngss in the USA
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:58 PM EST
    #ASEChat what would one do if we did not have exam specs like this?!!!
    In reply to @NeedhamL56, @MaryUYSEG
  • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:58 PM EST
    Lucky you! mine are long gone #ASEchat
    In reply to @margaretflem, @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56
  • stevethedoc1 Feb 19 @ 3:59 PM EST
    #asechat do you mean pupils go to the researcher's lab
    In reply to @ViciaScience, @NeedhamL56
  • margaretflem Feb 19 @ 3:59 PM EST
    #ASEchat but I am a hoarder not a good trait
    • ViciaScience Feb 19 @ 3:58 PM EST
      Lucky you! mine are long gone #ASEchat
      In reply to @margaretflem, @stevethedoc1, @NeedhamL56
  • NeedhamL56 - Moderator Feb 19 @ 3:59 PM EST
    definitely agree, but lots of school science isn’t like what you described, exams and accountability smothering this sort of creativity #asechat
    • PhysicsPundit Feb 19 @ 3:57 PM EST
      Should there be an edge at all? Surely a seamless landscape of school and real science would prepare our STEM students for adult life more effectively?
      In reply to @NeedhamL56